![]()  | 
	
| 
		 
 
		The Mediterranean Station (1816 - 1838) 
		
		National Intelligencer (Washington, 
		DC) Abstracts, 1820‑1835
		 
		TUE APR 11, 1820 
		Died: on Mar 29, at his house in Charlestown, Va., in his 29th year, 
		Lieutenant John Packett, U.S.N. 
		He was in the action with 
		Java; served as a Midshipman in
		Constitution under Commodore 
		Bainbridge; was at Lake Erie and aided in the victory of Sep 10, 1813. 
		 
		SAT MAY 19, 1821 
		 
		Ofcrs attached to the 
		Constitution 
		Cmdor Jacob Jones; Cpt B W Booth 
		Lts: 
		Foxhall A Parker                            
		Geo. W Storer                          
		David Geisinger 
		Saml L Breese                                
		Wm Boerum            
		                  Jos R Jarvis 
		Midshipmen: 
		Edmund M Russell                          
		Richd A Jones                          
		Jott S Paine 
		John M Sullivan                              
		John Marston                            
		John D Bird 
		Saml F Dupont   
		                             Archibald R Bogardus               
		Wilson C Purviance 
		Thos B Worthington                       
		Lucius C Heylin                         
		John H Little 
		John Hambleton                              
		Chas W Gray                    
		        J Bradford 
		F B Ellison                                      
		Thompson D Shaw                   
		Henry J Auchmuty 
		Saml Gaillard                                  
		Edw S Lewis                            
		Thos H Saul 
		John Marshal                      
		             John L Buchanan 
		Sailing Mstr, Jas H Ferguson 
		Purser, Thos Breese 
		Surg, Geo S Sproston 
		Surg mates: Wilmot S Rogers & 
		Thos J Boyd 
		Chaplain, Addison Searl  
		Marine Oficer, Lt Richd Auchmuty 
		Passengers: Capt John H Elton, 
		Lts McKeever & Levy 
		The complement of seamen & boys 
		is about 400 - Marines 50 - all told, 500. 
		 
		MON JUN 7, 1824 
		 
		Died: on Wed, on the qtr deck of 
		the U S frig Constitution, Navy Yd 
		N. Y., Capt Saml Evans, of the U S N, having ruptured a blood 
		vessel in ascending the gangway of that ship. 
		 
		WED NOV 3, 1824 
		 
		List of officers attached to 
		Constitution. 
		 
		THU JUL 6, 1826 
		 
		Died: on May 1 last, of typhus 
		fever, on board the U S ship Constitution, at Gibraltar, De Witt 
		Birch, M. D., Surg's mate in the U S Navy. 
		 
		WED AUG 1, 1827 
		Arrival of the ship N.C. [North 
		Carolina], of 74 guns, Cmdor John Rodgers, 58 days from Gibraltar, 
		anchored in Hampton Rds on Jul 28; absent from the U. S. for 28 mos… 
		Ofcrs transferred & left in the Mediterranean: 
		Lt Robt B Randolph, in the ship 
		Constitution;…  
		Midshipman:…Edw O Blanchard, to the ship
		Constitution… 
		MON FEB 25, 1828                       
		 
		.The U. S. ship of the line 
		Delaware, Capt John Downes, left Hampton Rds, on Tues last, destined 
		for the Mediterranean… 
		Passengers: 
		…Lt S W Downing, to join the U. S. ship
		Constitution… 
		SAT JUL 12, 1828 
		Died on Apr 7, at Port Mahon, of pulmonary consumption, Midshipman Henry 
		Kip Mower, attached to the U. S. frig
		Constitution. 
		FRI AUG 22, 1828 
		Wm Smith, a new recruit on board the U. S. frig Constitution, at 
		present living [sic: lying] at the Navy Yd, Charlestown, on Tue fell 
		from the main mast head to the vessel on deck; he survived but a few hrs 
		- Boston ppr. 
		FRI OCT 14, 1831 
		Theatrical: debut in this country: Miss Clifton was born in N Y on Mar 
		9, 1814; lost her fr before she was 12 mo old he was killed on board the 
		frig Constitution, in her action with Cyane, Feb 20, 1815. 
		Her bro is now serving as a midshipman on board the sloop of war 
		Kensington.  Miss C was 
		educated at Emmetsburg Seminary, Md: returned to this city 3 yrs ago. 
		[Not supported by muster roll.] 
		THU MAR 22, 1832 
		Died: on Mar 17, of dropsy, at the U S naval Hosp, at Portsmouth, Va, Lt 
		Alex'r Eskridge, of the U S navy, a ntv of Va, aged 39. 
		He had but a short time since returned from a long cruise in the 
		Mediterranean, in the frig Constitution. 
		Previous to, & during the cruise, he had been in very bad health, 
		& on arrival here, finding that his disease was assuming a most 
		dangerous character, he went on Feb 2 to the hosp. 
		He entered the svc of his country Jan 1, 1812 - promoted to the 
		rank of Lt, Mar 5, 1817.  In 
		all actions of the frig Constitution, during the late war, he 
		nobly did his duty. 
		WED MAY 18, 1833 
		Case of Robert B. Randolph, late Lt. on board Constitution who 
		was dismissed after discovery of irregularities in accounts while acting 
		Purser after Purser Timberlake became deranged and attempted suicide; 
		also attempt by Randolph to kill President Andrew Jackson. 
		 
		WED NOV 20, 1833 
		Robert B. Randolph arrested and confined in Richmond, Va, jail. 
		FRI NOV 22, 1833 
		Fears that a mob may try to break Robert B. Randolph out of jail. 
		THU JAN 2, 1834 
		Copy of the Randolph cae before U S Circuit Court & opinion of Chief 
		Justice Marshall. 
		TUE FEB 18, 1834 
		Died on Feb 10, at his residence in Prince Georges County, Md, Lt Jos 
		Cross, of the U S Navy.  The 
		dec'd entered the Navy, a Mdshpmn, in 1811, & served throughout the war 
		on board the frig Constitution, participating in all her well-fought 
		battles.  He was among those 
		sons of Md & on whom t he Leg of their ntv state, with a becoming sense 
		of their gallant svcs, had bestowed swords, & other marks of 
		approbation. 
		WED JUL 2, 1834 
		Boston, Jun 21.  The noble 
		frig Constitution was hauled out of the Dry Dock this morning, at 
		the Navy Yd & viewed by many persons assembled to see her. 
		The repairs, when after nrly 40 yrs riding triumphantly, were 
		undergone & have been very extensive. 
		With the exception of her floor timbers, & a few strips of plank 
		on her garboard streak, we understand that the whole ship has been built 
		up of new materials: the original model carefully preserved -- Merc. 
		SAT DEC 27, 1834 
		Died: On Dec 10, at Jamaica, L. I., after a lingering illness, Capt 
		Beekman V Hoffman, of the U S Navy, in his 46th year. 
		Lt. Beekman Verplank Hoffman served in this capacity on board of 
		the frig Constitution, the immortal "Old Ironsides," in all her 
		celebrated battles, coming out of the fight unscathed & unwounded, to 
		die on shore, in the bosom of his family & of that land, it is true, to 
		whose star-spangled banner his svcs had given a luster, but like his 
		renowned predecessors, Decatur, Perry & MacDonough, cut off at an age 
		too premature etc.  He was 
		born Nov. 28, 1789, & entered the American Navy at age 14, as a 
		midshipman.  He was on board 
		the ship Argus before the victories over Guerriere & 
		Java, & finally in her capture of the ships Cyane & Levant, 
		the former of which he brought into N Y as a prize-mstr. 
		After the war he was promoted to mstr-comdt & post=capt, cmnded 
		first the Ship Tom Bowline, & afterwards the sloop of war 
		Boston, during her long cruise on the So A sta; since his return he 
		has been residing with his family as hisseat at Jamaica L I, where in 
		the midst of domestic happiness, he has been hurried by a dropsical 
		affection of the chest to an untimely grave, -- Star. 
		SAT JAN 24, 1835 
		Obit: died Lt Wm Taylor, of the U S Navy. 
		A mere boy on board the ship Constitution, was in her 
		first victory of the ship Guerriere, as an aid to Capt Hull. 
		He Was in the action of the same ship with the ship Java, 
		while still a boy - he filled the honorable post to the intrepid 
		Bainbridge on the occasion I had the honor to be his surgeon. 
		I saw him at his gun on that memorable night, that the same 
		Constitution tore down the colors that valor had nailed to the mast. 
		This exploit was indeed well, & described by the brave young 
		Scotchman, Capt Douglas, who was a senior in Command, as the "coup de 
		grace" of the war.  When that 
		young nobleman presented his sword to Capt Stewart, it was gallantly 
		returned. -- K [Surgeon John A. Kearney] 
		THU FEB 26, 1835 
		Cmdor Hull has been presented with a beautiful vase from a lock taken 
		from the timbers of the U S frig Constitution. 
		It was carved by Mr Ives, an ingenious artist of Boston. 
		On one side is the chase of the Constitution by the Brit 
		squad; the other side - her encounter with the ship Guerriere. 
		On the circle of the vase are the heads of 6 principal Naval 
		Ofcrs. 
		MON MAR 9, 1835 
		Cmdor Downes has been appt'd to the command of the Navy Yd at 
		Charlestown, nr Boston, Mass, to succeed Cmdor Elliott, app't to the 
		cmnd of the frig Constitution. 
		FRI JUN 26, 1835 
		NY Jnl of Commerce, Jun 23.  
		The frig Constitution,Cmdor Elliott, came up this morning, fired 
		a salute  & anchored in the 
		North Rvr.  Mr. Livingston & 
		family came ashore in a Lt's barge, under a 2nd salute, & 
		landed on the steps at Castle Garden. 
		He will soon repair to Wash City. 
		
		Military And Naval Magazine Of The United States 
		(March 1833 - 
		February 1836) VOLUME II (September 1833-February 1834) Number 1 Page 63 -- Lieutenant S. F. Dupont married Sophia 
		M., daughter of E. J. Dupont. at                                                                                                             
		Eleutherian Mills, Delaware, 27 June 1833. 
		 --  
		Commodore William Bainbridge died at Philadelphia on 27 July 
		1833. --  
		Passed Midshipman Wm F. Hooe died in King County, Virginia, on 14 
		August 1833 Volume V (March-August 1835) Number 1 Page 78 -- The U.S. frigate Constitution has been 
		fitted for sea at Boston, and will sail      
		               shortly for the Mediterranean. 
		The following officers have been ordered to her: Commodore 
		J. D. Elliott, commander. 
		     
		Lieutenants--J. B. Montgomery, F. Ellery, W. C. Nicholson, E. C. 
		Rutledge, G. F. Pearson, F. A. Neville.     
		Surgeon--T. J. Boyd. 
		Assistant Surgeons--I. Brinckerhoff, R. Woodworth.     
		Purser--H. Etting. 
		Chaplain--J. Everett.     
		Master--J. Ferguson. 
		Second Master--J. M. Berrien.     
		Passed Midshipmen--J. F. Duncan, C. Steedman, J. W. 
		Revere, J. W. Cooke, W. T. Muse, J. L. Henderson.      
		Midshipmen--G. T. Sinclair, G. W. Randolph, J. N. Maffitt, 
		T. Oakes, B. F. Shattuck, W. S. Parkinson, E. C. Anderson, S. D. 
		Trenchard, E. E. Rodgers, R. H. Jenkins, J. B. Lewis, T. S. Haggerty, R. 
		H. Tilghman.     
		Boatswain--W. Hart. 
		Carpenter--J. A. Dickson.     
		Gunner--T. Ryley. 
		Sailmaker--N. 
		C. L'Hommedieu. Page 80 -- First Lieutenant Joseph L. C. Hardy 
		under orders to the frigate Constitution,      
		February 1835. Number 2 Page 159 -- The frigate Constitution was towed up 
		to the Navy Yard at New York, by the   
		steamboats American Eagle and Flushing, on Wednesday the 11th 
		March; when opposite the battery she fired a salute. 
		On Sunday morning, 15th March, the ship was towed down 
		the harbor by two steamboats, and went to sea about ten o'clock with a 
		pleasant breeze. Number 4 Page 319 -- The frigate Constitution, Com. Elliott, 
		arrived at Havre, on the 10th April, in  
		24 days from New York. 
		Com. E. proceeded immediately to Paris, with dispatches for our 
		minister. Number 6 Page 479 -- The following officers have been 
		detached from the U. S. frigate Constitution:      
		Lieutenants: F. Ellery and E. C. Rutledge -- Purser 
		H. Etting -- Passed Midshipman J. F. Mercer -- Midshipmen 
		J. B. Lewis, B. F. Shattuck, F. P. Hoban, and F. Oakes -- Carpenter 
		J. A. Dickason. 
		     
		Purser J. N. Hambleton has been ordered to the Constitution, 
		vice Etting relieved.     
		Commodores Chauncey and Morris, Commissioners of the Navy, being 
		in New York, visited the frigate Constitution on Friday, 10th 
		July. Volume VI (September 1835-February 1836) Number 1 Page 74 -- The United States frigate Constitution, 
		bearing the broad pennant of Commodore J. D. Elliott, sailed from New 
		York on the 19th August, for the Mediterranean. 
		So many changes in her officers have taken place since her return 
		to New York, that we publish the list entire.            
		List of Officers attached to the United States ship 
		Constitution.            
		 
		     
		Jesse D. Elliott, Esq., Commander of the Mediterranean squadron.     
		Lieutenants--William Boerum, George F. Pearson, Frederick 
		A. Neville, John Colhoun, James M. Watson.     
		Henry A. Steele, Acting Sailingmaster; Henry Darcantel, 
		2d do.     
		J. L. C. Hardy, First Lieutenant Marines.     
		Thomas J. Boyd, Surgeon of the fleet in the Mediterranean.     
		John N. Hambleton, Purser.     
		Assistant Surgeons.--Robert Woodworth, Victor L. Godon.     
		Commodore's Secretary.--Jesse E. Dow.     
		Passed Midshipmen.--Harry P. T. Wood, Percival Drayton, B. 
		W. Hunter, Wm T. Muse, Charles Steedman,  Midshipmen.--George W. Randolph, George T. Sinclair, Charles Hunter, Henry P. Robertson, C. E. Fleming,       E. C. Anderson, 
		Eugene E. Rodgers, A. H. Jenkins, Charles Wager.     
		Captain's Clerk, John C. Holland. 
		Boatswain, Robert Whitaker. 
		Gunner, Thomas Ryley. 
		Sailmaker,                                                
		           Passengers.     
		Master Commandant Silas H. Stringham, to take command of 
		the John Adams.     
		Lieutenant John A. Davis, for the John Adams.     
		Surgeon, Robert J. Dodd.                                                 
		For the schooner Shark. 
		     Ebenezer 
		Ridgeway, Lieutenant Commandant. 
		     
		Lieutenants, B. J. Totten, Thomas W. Brent.     
		Midshipman Charles Haywood.     
		Joseph Hoban, Captain's Clerk to Lieutenant Commanding 
		Ridgeway.     
		On the arrival of the Constitution the Delaware 74 will return to 
		the United States. Page 75 -- Midshipman R. C. Tilghman resigned, 24th 
		July. Number 3 Page 234 -- Frigate Constitution, Commodore 
		Elliott, arrived at Gibraltar, 11th September   
		--twenty-three days from Sandy Hook -- all well. Number 4 Page 316 -- The U. S. Frigate Constitution, 
		Commodore Elliott, left Gibraltar for Mahon on the 18th 
		September. Number 5 Page 383 -- "Killed and Wounded on board the 
		Guerriere.          
		Killed--3 officers, 12 seamen and marines.          
		Wounded--J. A. Dacres [sic], captain, 4 officers, 57 seamen and 
		marines.          
		Missing--Lieutenants Pullman and Roberts, and 22 seamen and 
		marines, supposed to have gone 
		overboard with the masts." 
		                             
		
		Hingham (MA) Gazette, 28 JUNE 
		1833
		
		 
		President Andrew Jackson arrived in Boston on 21 June and was quickly 
		involved in many ceremonies. The President missed church on Sunday morning, 
		complaining of fatigue, but felt better in the afternoon and attended 
		services at Old South Meeting House that evening. 
		On Monday morning, 25 June, he was "unable to be present" at the 
		drydocking of CONSTITUTION.  
		On that occasion, Commodore Hull presented a cane of CONSTITUTION wood 
		to Vice President Van Buren for delivery to the President. 
		He made similar presentations to the Governor of Massachusetts 
		and to Joel Poinsett, representing the Governor of South Carolina. 
		At ceremonies at Bunker Hill Monument that afternoon, after brief 
		remarks, the President was "presented with a box made from the timber of 
		'Old Ironsides,' containing a ball thrown at the Battle of New Orleans, 
		and another thrown at the Battle of Bunker Hill." 
		Later that day, Jackson visited the Navy Yard, then proceeded on 
		to Salem via Lynn. 
		
		
		Army And Navy 
		Chronicle (1835-1844) 
		[Note: Selected isuues.] 
		
		Volume I
		
		Number
		1 (January 3, 1835) 
		From “Proceedings in Congress:” “On the motion of Mr. 
		Lane of Indiana, Resolved, That the Committee on Military Affairs be 
		instructed to inquire into the expediency of providing by law for the 
		education, at the Military Academy, of the Junior Midshipmen now in 
		service, and of such as may be hereafter appointed. 
		The whole number of students not to exceed the number of Cadets 
		allowed by the existing laws.” 
		(Page 3, column 2.) 
		Copied from official sources, the British and French 
		navies, as of January 1835, consisted of: 
		British                                                           
		French 
		 22 ships of 
		the line (100+ guns)                   
		 
		 99 ships of the line (74 guns and 
		up)         
		40 ships of the line (74-80 guns)     
		104 frigates (42 guns and up)                     
		52 frigates (1st, 2nd, 3rd 
		classes)     
		310 ships (36-40 guns)                              
		25 corvettes                                                                       
		300 brigs, schooners, gunboats 
		       
		22 steam vessels                                      
		17 steam vessels               
		(Page 8.) 
		
		Number 2 (January 8, 1835)
		
		Death notice of Captain B. V. Hoffman. 
		Died of dropsy, 10 December 1834, at Jamaica, LI, NY. 
		(Page 16.) 
		 
		Number
		4 (January 22, 1835) 
		 
		Reported deaths during 1834: 
		Captain B. V. Hoffman, 10 Dec, Jamaica, LI. 
		Lieutenant Joseph Cross, 10 Feb, Prince George’s 
		County, MD..   
		Sailing Master Wm Knight, 22 Jul, Philadelphia. 
		 
		Resignations: 
		Lieutenant Philip A Stockton 14 Feb. 
		Midshipman A. Wadsworth, 6 Sep.           
		(Page 32.) 
		
		Number 5 (January 29, 1835)
		
		 
		Deaths: 
		Lieutenant William Taylor, 13 Jan 1835, at Norfolk, VA. 
		(Page 40.) 
		
		Number 6 (February 5, 1835)
		
		 
		    “It has been 
		stated in several papers, on the authority of a letter from an officer 
		of the Navy at Norfolk, that the ship of the line North Carolina, 
		frigates Constitution and United States, and three sloops of war, have 
		been ordered to get ready for sea immediately. 
		    “We have reason 
		to believe that the statement with regard to the first named of these 
		vessels is premature.  Orders 
		may have been issued to have certain vessels put in a state of readiness 
		to be equipped for sea.--  
		The only two known to be preparing are the frigate Constitution and the 
		sloop of war Peacock.  Both 
		will be ready for sea, probably, in the course of the present month…” 
		(Page 48.) 
		
		Number 7 (February 12, 1835)
		
		 
		Passed Midshipman J. DeCamp returned from the Mediterranean in ill 
		health.  (Page 52.) 
		
		Number 8 (February 19, 1835)
		
		 
		“The Boston 
		Evening Gazette states, that a beautiful vase has been made for 
		Commodore Hull, out of a block of wood from the hull of ‘Old Ironsides,’ 
		the U. S. frigate Constitution. 
		It was carved by Mr. Ives, an ingenious artist of that city. 
		One side of the vase represents the Constitution chased by the 
		British fleet; the other, her affair with the Guerriere, off Gloucester, 
		after the action, the Guerriere, in flames. 
		On the circle of the vase, are six heads of the principal naval 
		officers, viz.:- Hull, Bainbridge, Lawrence, Stewart and others; and the 
		handles represent a grape vine, similar to the famous Warwick vase. 
		It is certainly well done, and as a specimen of finished carving, 
		does great credit to the artist.” 
		(Page 61.) 
		Marriages: 
		Passed Midshipman Charles Crillon Barton married Anna, eldest daughter 
		of Hugh F. Hollingshead of Philadelphia, on 2 Feb.    
		(Page 64.) 
		
		Number 9 (February 26, 1835)
		
		 
		“Our Navy Yard 
		at Charlestown presents at this moment rather a busy scene: a number of 
		the largest size guns, and a great quantity of ammunition were received 
		at the yard while we were there a few days since, and we understand that 
		more is on that way, and that orders have been received ‘to have the 
		Constitution and Boston fitted for sea as quick as possible.’ 
		The former is nearly ready… -- Boston Advocate.” (Page 
		72.) 
		Marriages: 
		Lieutenant Franklin Buchanan married Nannie, 
		daughter of the late Governor Lloyd of Maryland, on 19 Feb. 
		(Page 72.) 
		
		Number 10 (March 5, 1835)
		
		 
		“It is stated 
		in the Boston newspapers that Commodore Elliott has taken command of the 
		U. S. Frigate Constitution.  
		There is no foundation, we believe, for the rumor that Commodore Rodgers 
		was going out in this ship to assume the command of our squadron in the 
		Mediterranean.”  (Page 76.) 
		“List of 
		officers ordered to the U. S. Frigate Constitution. 
		« Commodore J. D. Elliott, commander. 
		“Lieutenants—J. B. Montgomery, F. Ellery, W. C. 
		Nicholson, E. C. Rutledge, G. F Pearson, F. A. Neville, L. M. Powell. 
		“Surgeon, T. J. 
		Boyd. 
		“Assistant 
		Surgeons, I. Brinckerhoff, R. Woodworth. 
		“Purser—H. 
		Eting.          
		Chaplain—J. Everett. 
		“Master—J. 
		Ferguson.  Second Master—J. 
		M. Berrien. 
		“Passed 
		Midshipmen—J. F. Duncan, C. Steedman, J. W. Revere, J. W. Cooke, W. T. 
		Muse,  J. L. Henderson. 
		“Midshipmen—G. T. Sinclair, G. W. Randolph, J. N. 
		Maffitt, T. Oakes, B. F. Shattuck, W. S. Parkinson, E. C. Anderson, S. 
		D. Trenchard, E. E. Rodgers, R. H. Jenkins, J. B. Lewis, T. S. Haggerty, 
		R. H. Tilghman. 
		“Boatswain—W. 
		Hart.  Carpenter—J. A. 
		Dickson. 
		“Gunner—T. 
		Ryley.   Sailmaker—N.
		
		C. L’Hommedieu. »  (Page 80.) 
		
		Number 11 (March 12, 1835)
		
		 
		    “The 
		Constitution was towed out of Boston harbor by the steamboat Bangor, on 
		Monday, 2d inst. and anchored inside of Sandy Hook on Saturday, the 7th.” 
		(Page 88.) 
		
		Number 12 (March 19, 1835)
		
		 
		
		 “…The Frigate Constitution was 
		towed up to the Navy Yard at New York, by the steamboat American Eagle 
		and Flushing [sic], on Wednesday the 12th; when opposite the 
		battery she fired a salute.  
		On Sunday, morning the ship was towed down the harbor by two steamboats, 
		and went to sea about 10 o’clock with a pleasant breeze.” 
		(Page 96.) 
		
		Number 13 (March 26, 1835)
		“Naval Forces of the Different Powers of the World…Countries Liners Frigates Sloops etc. Steamers Total 
 
		Great Britain             
		165     
		217        
		224        
		49      
		746 
		France            
		         
		39      
		51        
		213        
		10      
		333 
		Russia                     
		32      
		25        
		107         
		4      
		168   
		Ottoman Empire             
		18      
		24         
		90         
		0      
		132 
		 
		Holland                    
		12      
		33     
		     56         
		2      
		103 
		Sweden and Norway 
		         
		10      
		13        
		238         
		0      
		261   
		Spain                       
		1       
		3         
		30         
		0       
		34 
		Denmark                     
		4       
		7         
		14         
		0       
		25   
		Portugal                    
		4       
		6         
		37         
		2       
		49 
		Austria                     
		 3       
		8         
		61         
		0       
		72 
		Sardinia & Two Sicilies     
		4       
		8         
		17         
		0       
		29 
		Greece                      
		1       
		2          25         
		2       
		30           
		 Popedom [sic] 0 0 8 0 8 Duke of Tuscany 0 0 1 0 1 
		Prussia                     
		0       
		0          
		1         
		0        
		1  
		 United States 7 10 24 0 41 
		                                                                                                                                            
		(Page 100.) 
		Number 24 (June 11, 1835) 
		“The frigate 
		Constitution, Commodore Elliott, was off Havre on the 25th 
		April, and after taking in water would sail in a few days on her return 
		to the United States, with Mr. Livingston on board.” 
		(Page 192.) 
		
		Number 25 (June 18, 1835)
		
		“It was rumored 
		in Washington in the early part of the week, that the frigate 
		Constitution arrived at New York on Friday, having on board Mr. 
		Livingston and family; but the New York papers of Saturday are silent 
		upon the subject, nor can we learn that the mail of Tuesday morning 
		brought any confirmation of the rumor. 
		“The frigate 
		may be hourly expected, as the English papers state that she sailed from 
		Havre on the 5th May.”                     
		(Page 196.) 
		“The French 
		papers brought by the late arrivals from Europe contain the following 
		intelligence, which we hope may tend to soothe any irritability of 
		feeling that may subsist between us and our former allies. 
		“The Journal of 
		Cherbourg, of the 26th April, says: ‘Yesterday afternoon, at 
		4 o’clock, the civil, maritime, and military authorities of Cherbourg 
		paid a visit on board the American frigate Constitution, which received 
		them with a salute, which was returned by our batteries on shore.’…”                   
		(Page 197.) 
		
		Number 26 (June 25, 1835)
		
		“The United 
		States’ frigate Constitution, with Mr. Livingston on board, arrived at 
		Plymouth, England, on the 13th May, bound to the United 
		States.  She was to remain 
		there a few days.” 
		“Liverpool, May 
		16.—The late ambassador from the United States to France, Mr. 
		Livingston, is sojourning for a few days with his family at Plymouth. 
		His excellency arrived there on Wednesday, in the Constitution 
		American frigate, fifty guns, 460 men, Captain Elliott, bound to the 
		United States from Havre. 
		“The frigate 
		fired a royal salute, which was answered by the San Josef guard-ship, 
		Captain Falcon, C.B. the commander, having previously gone alongside the 
		Constitution.  A royal salute 
		was also fired from the batteries of the citadel in compliment to the 
		American ambassador. 
		“The ladies of 
		Mr. Livingston’s family have suffered much from sea sickness, and the 
		honorable gentleman himself does not appear in good health. 
		The wind continues contrary, and it is to be hoped that, ere it 
		proves favorable, for the Constitution to proceed, himself and 
		companions will have received the advantage of repose and change of 
		air.”             
		           (Page 208.) 
		
		Number 27 (July 2, 1835)
		
		“The frigate 
		Constitution arrived at…New York on the 23d June, with Mr. Livingston 
		and family; all well.”  (Page 
		216.) 
		
		Number 28 (July 9, 1835)
		
		“Mr. 
		Livingston, before leaving New York, presented Commodore Elliott a gold 
		box, as a return for attentions received wile a passenger in the frigate 
		Constitution.  It is said to 
		be a superb box, beautifully chased, with the Commodore's initials on 
		the outer lid, and within, the inscription, 
		
		                         
		                ‘A Souvenir of the Constitution
		
		                                                        
		To 
		
		                                          
		COMMODORE ELLIOTTT
		
		                                                   
		From His Friend
		
		                  
		                      EDWARD LIVINGSTON.’”        
		(Page 220.) 
		    
		“Naval Academy.—The commissioned and warrant officers of the U. 
		S. frigate Constitution held a meeting on the 20th June, 
		while at sea on her return to the United States, for the purpose of 
		concerting measures to effect the establishment of a Naval Academy. 
		Lieutenant John B. Montgomery was called to the chair, and Purser 
		Henry Etting appointed Secretary. 
		"The preamble 
		sets forth, that the officers have ever felt the most ardent desire to 
		prosecute successfully the profession to which they are devoted: to 
		advance the interests of the Navy, and to perpetuate the commercial 
		prosperity of our common country, consigned in part to their 
		safe-keeping: taught by the experience of the past, that neither 
		industry nor talent can supply the advantage offered by early education, 
		they are earnestly desirous of the means for securing to those who may 
		enter the Navy hereafter: that they deplore the inadequacy of the 
		existing system, to accomplish either the object of the Government, or 
		to meet the wishes of the officers for professional instruction: that 
		they believe a respectful representation of the anxious hopes which the 
		entire Navy have ventured to indulge for so many years, and to 
		the consummation of which they look with the deepest interest, 
		will receive the consideration to which so excellent an object is 
		entitled, and that it will find from liberal authorities that indulgence 
		which is ever accorded to generous aspirations and laudable exertions. 
		They have, therefore, unanimously resolved, That they deem 
		education to be of peculiar importance to the sea officer; and that amid 
		the progressive improvements in the arts and sciences which distinguish 
		the present age, the military marine would be most conspicuous, if 
		guided in its advance by the lights of education: That they look to the 
		establishment of a naval school as the only means of imparting to the 
		officers of the Navy, that elementary instruction and scientific 
		knowledge, which has become almost indispensable at the present day to 
		the military seaman: That from circumstances arising in part from 
		professional causes, the schoolmasters on board our ships can rarely, if 
		ever, impart such elementary or scientific knowledge, or advance the 
		education of the navy officer; and that, if the office were abolished, 
		no evil would result therefrom: That they believe the expense incurred 
		by Government in providing schoolmasters for ships, and professors of 
		mathematics for the junior officers of the Navy, would liberally sustain 
		a scientific institution; and they would see, with pleasure, the same 
		funds directed to the establishment and support of a naval school. 
		“A copy of the 
		proceedings was directed to be furnished to the Secretary of the Navy, 
		with a request that he will lend his countenance to the undertaking, and 
		that he would lay the resolutions before the President. 
		Copies were also to be furnished to the chairmen of the Naval 
		Committees in the House and Senate, to Commodore Elliott, and to Mr. 
		Livingston; and forwarded to each naval station, squadron, and ship in 
		commission, with a view to invoke the co-operation of officers belonging 
		thereto. 
		“A committee of 
		ten was appointed to take charge of the subject, and conduct it to its 
		final disposition, with directions to ascertain and report to the 
		Secretary of the Navy the probable annual expense of a naval school. 
		This committee consists of Lieutenant L. M. Powell, Surgeon T. J. 
		Boyd, Passed Midshipmen W. Radford, C. Steedman, W. T. Muse, Midshipmen 
		R. L. Tilghman, G. W. Randolph, F. S. Haggerty, F. P. Hoban, and J. B. 
		Lewis. 
		“This is a very 
		important movement, and exhibits a most commendable spirit. 
		The officers who have grown up with the Navy, sensibly feel the 
		want of an early and thorough education, and they now offer their 
		testimony in support of the advantages anticipated from the 
		establishment of a naval academy. 
		Officers of other ships and stations will undoubtedly join in the 
		recommendation, and should the design meet the concurrent support of the 
		President and Secretary of the Navy, it will and must obtain the 
		favorable consideration of Congress; when fortified by the united voices 
		of the officers, public opinion will sanction the enactment by the 
		National Legislature of a law for the establishment and liberal support 
		of an academy.  This subject 
		has hitherto had to contend with the too common and erroneous notion, 
		that because the Navy had succeeded so well without an academy, it was 
		wholly unnecessary.  Such an 
		idea cannot be too strongly reprobated and discountenanced. 
		We hope a brighter era is now about to dawn upon our Navy, and 
		that Congress will follow out the liberal disposition manifested in the 
		law respecting pay, by providing for the mental improvement of the 
		future protectors of our rights abroad, upon whom, whether in war or in 
		peace, so much must always depend.” 
		(Page 220.) 
		
		Number 29 (July 16, 1835)
		
		“The New York 
		Gazette, speaking of the [4th of July] celebration in that 
		city, says:- 
		“The U. S. 
		Frigate Constitution, at anchor off the battery, was dressed in 
		beautiful style with the American colors, and numerous private signals, 
		and it was generally remarked that thee never was a handsomer display of 
		bunting.  Her salutes at one 
		o’clock, and at sundown, were fired with scientific precision. 
		The sound of her cannon reminded everybody of her victories, and 
		the huzzaing for old ‘Ironsides’ thrilled every American bosom. 
		“In the 
		evening, while on the battery, we were delighted with the taste with 
		which the Constitution was illuminated, and with the fire-works let off 
		from this noble ship.  
		The whole scene on the water was rendered completely enchanting, by the 
		numerous well lighted steamboats gliding around the frigate, each 
		exchanging rockets and huzzas with the generous souled tars on board.’” 
		(Page 228.) 
		
		Number 30 (July 23, 1835)
		
		
		                                       
		“From the Maryland Republican. 
		
		                                                   
		"NAVAL ACADEMY
		
		    
		“Mr. Editor:- It is with unalloyed satisfaction that I read the 
		proceedings of the ‘commissioned and warrant officers of the frigate 
		Constitution, relative to the Naval Academy,’  
		and the observations of the New York editor, by which they are 
		accompanied.  Can stronger 
		evidence of the necessity for such an institution be advanced, than is 
		furnished by the declaration of the officers of the Constitution? 
		Can a more powerful appeal be made to Congress in the behalf of 
		an academy than the desire expressed by officers to obtain that 
		‘scientific knowledge’ which is ‘indispensable to military seamen’? 
		I think not.  I have 
		often reflected on the situation of midshipmen when afloat, and have 
		always arrived at the opinion, that at such periods it is impossible for 
		them to bend their minds or devote their time to useful study. 
		When not actively employed in the discharge of their duties, or 
		taking the repose necessary for the support of nature, where are they? 
		Why crowded together in the steerage, where the bare circumstance 
		of their being collected leads to an indulgence of that levity, which is 
		inseparable from youth, and which is subversive of every disposition to 
		improvement.  When we look 
		on, or think of this, this class of officers, the majority of us are too 
		apt to view them as humble reefers, and nothing more. 
		We forget that they are young aspirants who are laboring to 
		qualify themselves for commands, that they may become the supporters of 
		the honor and rights of the country. 
		Their purpose is noble, and the National Legislature is bound by 
		patriotism to encourage and foster it. 
		There is only one effectual way of doing this: and that is by the 
		establishment of a naval academy. 
		At such an institution there would be no ship’s duty to call the 
		midshipman from his studies, and he would have room to pursue them 
		retired from the mischievous, trifling, or worthless, should any such by 
		chance or partiality make their way into it. 
		At such an institution he would not only acquire a knowledge of 
		those sciences, which it is necessary to understand to make him a 
		skillful navigator, but he would acquire a habit of reading, a habit of 
		thinking, and a thirst after information, that would be attended by a 
		mental improvement, which future events might place him in situations to 
		employ to the honor and profit of the country. 
		English naval officers have not only had to fight battles, but 
		they have had to dictate and negotiate treaties; and may not some of the 
		striplings who now spread themselves on the yards of our men of war, in 
		the course of time, be called on to do the same things for this country. 
		Where is the wise man, who can see so far into the future, as to 
		warrant him in giving a negative answer to this question? 
		There is another happy effect which would result from a naval 
		academy; youths who are too stupid to receive scholastic instruction, 
		and too vicious to be kept at home, could no longer be pushed into the 
		service by every father who happened to enjoy court favor. 
		The examination which would precede admission into the academy, 
		would form an insurmountable barrier to their entrance into the service, 
		and the national honor would be saved from the danger of being exposed 
		to the keeping of the indiscrete and incompetent. 
		“The arguments 
		which could be adduced in favor of the establishment of a naval academy 
		are numerous and powerful; but it is altogether useless to argue for the 
		promotion of a measure, which everybody admits would be productive of 
		wholesome effects to the nation; and which there is no serious diversity 
		of opinion concerning, further than in relation to the place at which 
		the academy ought to be placed. 
		The idea of connecting it with the Military Academy at West 
		Point, has been suggested; but that is absurd, and will never answer; to 
		fix it there would make both establishments unpopular and sink them 
		both—there would be an endless warfare between students in the two 
		institutions.  Where then, it 
		will be asked, is the most eligible place to establish a naval academy? 
		The question is readily answered—Annapolis is that place. 
		It stands in a central State: is but a few hours’ journey from 
		the seat of the National Government; it is healthful, and except from 
		the temptations to vice, which abound in larger cities. 
		Superadded to these considerations, the deep and beautiful 
		Severn, whose waves wash the northern limits of the town, presents a 
		sheet of water, on which vessels might be used to afford students an 
		opportunity of making themselves acquainted with much of the practical 
		part of their profession.  
		But why should I dwell on the superior advantages, which invite the 
		planting of a naval academy at Annapolis? 
		They are known of every intelligent man who has visited the 
		place; and it is trusted, will not be forgotten by our Senators and 
		Representatives in Congress, when the proposition to create a naval 
		academy, is submitted to that body. 
			
			A Friend To The Navy
		
		“The following 
		abstract from the proceedings and remarks referred to by our 
		correspondent, in the foregoing article, we had extracted from the 
		Naval Chronicle, before the proceedings themselves came to hand. 
		There can be no question, as our correspondent justly observes, 
		of the superior advantages possessed by Annapolis, as a site for a naval 
		school.  The North already 
		enjoys one national institution. 
		Maryland unites pretensions as a central situation, and as 
		bordering as closely to the south, as a due consideration for as 
		exemption from autumnal diseases will allow—open to the most beautiful 
		and spacious bay in the world, on the one hand, whose bosom is 
		continually whitened with the inspiring sight of the busy shipping, 
		employed in the commerce of the Chesapeake—and on the other, within two 
		hours’ travel of the seat of General Government—under the very eye, as 
		it were, of a superintending Congress, and at the very spot which is 
		destined by its position to become the sea port of the capital. 
		That these advantages are appreciated by scientific officers both 
		of our navy and army, we have had many positive proofs. 
		That they will be over looked when the time comes for a 
		selection, we can not allow ourselves to believe.—Editor.”
		 (Page 236.) 
		“Commodores 
		Chauncey and Morris, Commissioners of the Navy, being in New York, 
		visited the frigate Constitution, on Friday 10th instant.” 
		(Page 240.) 
		
		Number 31 (July 30, 1835)
		
		“Fatal 
		Accident.— At New York, on Thursday morning, while some of the sailors 
		on board the frigate Constitution were at work on the foretop, a block 
		accidentally fell upon the head of one of them, John Brown, a captain of 
		said top, who was instantly killed. 
		The remains of the deceased were conveyed to the navy yard by a 
		procession of boats, where he was interred with the honors of his 
		station.   (Page 245.) 
		
		Number 32 (August 6, 1835)
		
		“From the New York Gazette. 
		    
		“Complimentary.—There is nothing so well calculated to cement a 
		friendly feeling between nations as courtesy between naval and military 
		officers whenever and wherever they meet. 
		    
		“We are led to this remark, says the New York Gazette, in 
		consequence of a conversation with one of the officers recently returned 
		home in the U. S. frigate Constitution. 
		He informs us, that during the few days they were at Plymouth, 
		the officers of the ship had daily invitations to dine with the British 
		naval and army officers on that station. 
		They accepted the invitations several times, and were not only 
		treated with marked cordiality and politeness, but their toasts were 
		highly complimentary to our government, and its distinguished officer…” 
		(Page 251.) 
		“The New York 
		Courier has some judicious remarks on the importance of establishing a 
		Naval School.  They were 
		called forth by resolutions recently adopted by the officers of the 
		frigate Constitution, strongly recommending such an institution. 
		We are glad that the subject is taken up so earnestly in the 
		right quarter.  The 
		recommendation of the officers, who feel the want of scientific 
		education, is the most effectual mode of engaging the attention of the 
		nation to the subject and of getting it brought before Congress. 
		The supplying of the great want—which can only be supplied by a 
		naval school on a liberal scale, like the military school at West Point, 
		is all that is needed to make our navy complete. 
		Our great commerce supplies the primary material, sailors, and 
		our officers are full of zeal and pride in their profession, being 
		animated not only by warm national feeling, but also by glorious 
		recollections.  We trust that 
		the subject will be taken up at the next session of Congress in the 
		spirit which it merits, as being of national importance.—Baltimore 
		American.  (Page 253.) 
		 
		“The frigate 
		Constitution will sail from New York; under the command of Commodore 
		Elliott, in the course of the present month, for the Mediterranean. 
		(Page 256.) 
		
		Number 33 (August 13, 1835)
		
		“Master 
		commandant S. H. Stringham has been ordered to take passage in the 
		frigate Constitution for command of the U. S. ship John Adams, now in 
		the Mediterranean; Captain Conner, her present commander, having been 
		promoted. 
		“On the arrival 
		of the Constitution the Delaware 74 will return to the United States. 
		(Page 264.) 
		
		Number 34 (August 20, 1835)
		
		
		                 
		                               “NAVAL ACADEMY
		
		    
		“In contemplating the advantages likely to arise from the 
		establishment of a naval school, (similar to that for the advancement of 
		those for the army,) in some one of our many navy yards, we cannot but 
		hope for the future advancement of our service such measures, 
		which may be advantageous, may be taken by our friends in Congress 
		during the next session to secure so great an acquisition to our 
		institutions. 
		“This grand 
		bulwark of defence [sic] to our liberties and laws must call forth, from 
		true Americans, encomiums justly merited; and when we find so many who 
		are anxious for its advancement, we are satisfied that but one feeling 
		actuates the expressions of our countrymen. 
		A naval college for the education of aspirants must appear to all 
		an object not only desirable in itself, but one that will secure to our 
		navy, officers of distinguished abilities, and to our countrymen, 
		perfect security against invasion at home, and losses on the ocean. 
		Let the department, to whom we are principally indebted for all 
		benefits, only urge the necessity of such a step, and those who are now 
		‘unskilled in naval tactics’ will, in the course of their probation, be 
		competent, at their graduation from such a seminary, to take charge of 
		the deck of any of our floating emblems of liberty. 
		Does not the navy, as well as the army, deserve such an 
		institution?  Yes! 
		Every liberal mind will admit that, above all others, our navy 
		should be possessed of such men who will prove as our forefathers, true 
		guardians of liberty, and who won’t give up the ship. 
		                                                                            
		LAWRENCE”   (Page 
		271.) 
		
		Number 35 (August 27, 1835)
		
		“The United 
		States frigate Constitution, bearing the broad pennant of Commodore J. 
		D. Elliott, sailed from New York on Wednesday, 19th instant, 
		for the Mediterranean.  So 
		many changes in her officers have taken place since her return to New 
		York, that we publish the list entire… 
		Jesse Duncan 
		Elliott, Esq., Commander of the Mediterranean Squadron
		
		Lieutenants—William Boerum, Geo. F. Pearson, Fred. A. 
		Neville, John Colhoun, James M. Watson. 
		Henry A. Steele, Acting Sailing Master; Henry 
		Darcantel, 2d do. 
		J. L. C. Hanly, 1st. Lieut. of 
		Marines. 
		Thomas J. Boyd, Surgeon of the fleet in the 
		Mediterranean. 
		John N. Hambleton, Purser. 
		Assistant Surgeons.—Robert Woodworth, Victor L. Godon. 
		Commodore’s Secretary—Jesse E. Dow. 
		Passed Midshipmen—Harry 
		P. T. Wood, Percival Drayton, B. W. Hunter, Wm. T. Muse, Chas. Steedman, 
		Wm. S. Ringgold, Jos. W. Revere, Edward Middleton, Montgomery Lewis, 
		George L. Selden, Charles C. Barton, James W. Cooke. 
		Midshipmen—George W. Randolph, George T. Sinclair, Chas. 
		Hunter, Wm. Ronckendorff, Fred. A. Bacon, Fras. D. Haggerty, John N. 
		Maffitt, Henry P. Robertson, C. E. Fleming, E. C. Anderson, Eugene E. 
		Rodgers, A. H. Jenkins, Chas. Wager. 
		John C. Holland, Captain’s Clerk. 
		Robert Whittaker, Boatswain. 
		Thomas Ryley, Gunner. 
		Nath. C. L’Hommedieu, Sailmaker. 
		Francis Sager, Carpenter. 
		Edwin A. Teagle, Purser’s Clerk. 
		Passengers. 
		Master Commandant—Silas 
		H. Stringham, to take command of the John Adams. 
		Lieutenant—John A. Davis, for the John Adams. 
		For the 
		schooner Shark
		
		Ebenezer Ridgeway, Lieutenant 
		Commandant. 
		Lieutenants.—B. J. 
		Totten, Thomas W. Brent,. 
		Robert J. Dodd, Surgeon. 
		D. Fauntleroy, Purser. 
		Daniel Egbert, Pass. Ass. Surgeon. 
		Chas. Haywood, Passed Midshipman. 
		Joseph Hoban, Captain’s Clerk… “     
		(Page 280.) 
		
		Number 36 (September 3, 1835)
		
		“Sailing of Old 
		Ironsides, And Fortunate Escape.—On Tuesday afternoon, a large number of 
		officer, and men, among them five or six lieutenants, belonging to the 
		frigate, went down in the steamboat Hercules to embark. 
		On approaching the ship, near the quarantine, the steamboat 
		stopped, and a small boat was sent from the frigate—the officers and men 
		immediately jumped into the boat with their luggage, when the boat took 
		a sheer under the guard of the steamboat, filled, and immediately upset. 
		Great alarm prevailed on board of the steamboat and frigate for 
		the safety of those who were struggling with a strong current and a high 
		sea.  Boats were sent from 
		the ship, and benches, oars, &c. were thrown over, and every effort made 
		to rescue the men.  After 
		much exertion they were all picked up and reached the frigate in safety, 
		but with the loss of most of the luggage.—N. 
		Y. Commercial.  
		(Page 286.) 
		Number
		41 (October 8, 1835) 
		“Frigate 
		Constitution, Com. Elliott, which sailed from New York on the 19th 
		August for the Mediterranean, was on the 3d of September in latitude 
		35-22N, and longitude 29-52 -- all well.”                  
		(Page 328.) 
		
		Number 42 (October 15, 1835)
		
		
		“DEATHS
		
		“In Westchester county, N. Y., Lt. Henry J. 
		Auchmuty, of the Navy, aged 31             
		years.”                                   
		(Page 336.) 
		
		Number 43 (October 22, 1835)
		
		“Extract of a letter to the Secretary of the Navy from Commodore Jesse 
		D. Elliott, dated 
		U. S. Ship Constitution 
		Gibraltar, Sept. 11, 1835 
		“I have the honor to inform you that the Constitution arrived and 
		anchored at this port, this afternoon, after a passage of twenty-three 
		days from Sandy Hook.  
		“This ship sustains her high character for sailing.-- 
		The officers and crew are well, and all is peace and harmony on 
		board.”       
		(Page 344.) 
		
		Number 44 (October 29, 1835)
		
		Excerpts from a Congressional memorandum: 
		Thanks of 
		Congress presented to the following persons: 
		1805, March 3, to Commodore Preble, the officers and crews of his                                                           
		 
		squadron 
		Medals voted by 
		Congress to officers, for good conduct, &c.: 
		1805, March 3, to Commodore Edward Preble 
		1813, January 
		29, to Captain Isaac Hull and commissioned officers of                                                                                     
		 
		his ship. 
		     
		1813, January 29, to the nearest male relative of Lieutenant 
		Bush. 
		
		          
		1813, March 3, to Captain William Bainbridge and commissioned                                         
		 
		                      
		officers of frigate Constitution.  
		1816, February 22, to Captain Charles Stewart 
		and commissioned  
		officers of 
		frigate                                                     
		 
		                
		Constitution. 
		Swords voted by 
		Congress for gallant conduct, &c.1805, March 3, to each    
		commissioned officer and midshipman who distinguished themselves 
		in Commodore Preble’s attack on Tripoli.     
		(Page 346.) 
		Number
		47 (November 19, 1835) 
		 
		“The U. S. Frigate Constitution, commodore Elliott, 
		left Gibraltar for Mahon on the 18th Sept.                 
		(Page 376.) 
		Number
		50 (December 10, 1835) 
		 
		                                                    
		“MARRIAGE. 
		At Upper Marlboro, Md., on the 3d inst. at the seat 
		of David Cranford, Esq., by the Rev. Mr. Swan, Dr, John A. Kearney, 
		Surgeon, U. S. Navy, to Miss Mary M. Forrest, youngest daughter of the 
		late Richard Forrest, Esq.”   
		(Page 400.) 
		
		Volume II
		
		Number
		8 (February 25, 1836) 
		Midshipman Charles Hunter returned to the U. S. from
		Constitution on board Delaware, arriving in Hampton Roads 
		on 16 Feb., having sailed from Mahon on 18 Nov 1835.  
		  (Page 126.) 
		
		Number 9 (March 3, 1836)
		
		“The U. S. frigate Constitution arrived at 
		Smyrna on the 21st of November. 
		The Shark had arrived a few days previous. 
		Both vessels were there on the 11th Dec.” 
		(Page 144.) 
		
		Number 10 (March 10, 1836)
		
		
		NOTHING
		
		Number
		11 (March 17, 1836) 
		“The U. S. frigates Potomac, from Cadiz, and 
		Constitution, from Smyrna, sailed ` 
		from Gibraltar 4th Feb,”  
		(Page 176.) 
		
		Number 12 (March 24, 1836)
		
		
		“THE DUEL AT SMYRNA
		
		    “We invite 
		attention to the following extract of a letter from an officer in the 
		Navy.  The conduct of 
		Commodore Elliott cannot but excite the indignation of every friend to 
		humanity.  Under the 
		circumstances, it was brutal and unmanly in the extreme. 
		He could not have treated a dog with less feeling than he did 
		young Barton.  Lock-jaw might 
		have ensued, or amputation been rendered necessary to the unfortunate 
		young officer. 
		
		“Extract of a letter from an Officer in the Navy, dated
		
		Smyrna, Dec. 5, 1835. 
		“Passed Midshipman Charles C. Barton was severely wounded in the leg, in 
		a duel with Passed Midshipman P. T. Wood. 
		The quarrel, I believe, is one of old standing but brought to 
		this unhappy termination, by Mr. Barton being ordered to the schooner 
		Shark, where Mr. Wood was, who refused to mess with him, and the rest of 
		the mess followed his example. 
		This together with other insults, left Mr. B. no other recourse 
		but to call him out, when, after receiving two fires, his pistol 
		missing fire both times, he had his leg fractured by the second shot. 
		I am happy to add, that Mr. Barton’s conduct on the field, 
		evinced that coolness and determination which always emanate from a good 
		cause; and every person acquainted with the circumstances are of the 
		opinion of myself, that the course he pursued could not be avoided 
		without dishonor.  His 
		second, and the surgeon who attended, deemed it necessary for him to be 
		taken on board the Constitution, to have the ball extracted, rather than 
		to the schooner.  He was 
		accordingly carried on board, and the ball extracted with no difficulty. 
		During this time, Commodore Elliott absent from the ship, and as 
		soon as he returned the thing was of course reported by the first 
		Lieutenant.  You cannot judge 
		out surprise, to hear the order given ‘that Mr. Barton should be 
		immediately taken on board the Shark;’ this order being issued without 
		knowing what the consequence might be. 
		Dr. Boyd, the surgeon of the ship, immediately waited upon him, 
		and protested in the strongest terms against the inhuman order; 
		but he would not be heard by the Commodore, who said he must go, and he 
		‘would take the responsibility.’ 
		He was, therefore, hoisted over the side, and sent back to the 
		schooner.  You can imagine 
		what his sufferings must have been, laboring under the excitement 
		of opium, and such inhuman treatment. 
		Through Dr. Boyd’s intercession, he was removed on shore 
		yesterday, where he will receive all the attention and care which he 
		requires in his present condition.—Philadelphia Inquirer.”   
		(Page 188.) 
		           
		 
		           
		                                                         
		“U. S. Frigate Constitution 
		                                                                      
		Gibraltar Bay, Feb. 1st. 1836            
		 
		“To the Editor 
		of the New Castle, Del., Gazette.— 
		Sir—This ship arrived here on the 28th 
		ult. 23 days from Smyrna, communicating off Malta, and notwithstanding 
		we have not a person sick on the list, are refused pratique (liberty) as 
		being from one of the seats of the Plague. 
		We left Mahon on the 1st of last November, Athens on 
		the 17th of last month, Syra on the 20th, and 
		Smyrna on the 5th ultimo, remaining at that place only seven 
		weeks.  For want of time I am 
		unable to give you even a brief sketch of our interesting cruise, as we 
		get under weigh in an hour or two for Tangier and Cadiz… 
		“Lieut. Wm. Boerum, late 1st Lieut. 
		of this ship, has been appointed to command the Shark in place of 
		Lieutenant Ridgeway, who retires in ill health. 
		Henry Darcantel to be 1st Master, vice. H. A. Steele 
		promoted to Lieutenant, P. Drayton 2d Master. 
		Midshipman Ronckendorff has been ordered to the Shark, and passed 
		Midshipman Barton was left in Smyrna, having been wounded in a duel, and 
		unable to leave the shore.  
		Principals and Seconds are arrested, and will be so until the pleasure 
		of the Navy Department is known. 
		The practice is odious, no doubt, but one of which the Navy 
		cannot dispense.  It is the 
		only necessary evil we cannot throw aside. 
		Crew and officers enjoy unusual health. 
		“In haste, very respectfully,                                        
		A. 
		“P.S. 
		The Potomac is at Cadiz, John Adams at Madeira, and Shark daily 
		expected with our letters and papers from Mahon. 
		Until we entered this port, not a line had been received from the 
		United States, since our leaving, and now but one or two have been 
		gratified with the reception of such welcome messengers from home. 
		We are subject to many hard knocks from fortune, and this 
		disappointment is among them. 
		None, however, can compare with that which now presents 
		itself—‘That we are without the least hope of war,’ and monotonous 
		scenes of everyday life, through which we have passed, many of us, since 
		our boyhood. 
		                                    
		« Yours, &c.                          
		A. »  (Page 190.) 
		“Captain Wright, of the Brig Volant, arrived at Philadelphia from 
		Leghorn, states that on the 4th of February, the U. S. 
		frigate Constitution, Com. Elliott, in company with the U. S. ship 
		Potomac, spoke him while laying by back of the Rock of Gibraltar, and 
		sent his boat on board with several packages for President Jackson, and 
		requesting to report that the Constitution was 25 days from Smyrna, 
		bound for Tangier, the Moors having made some disturbance. 
		The whole U. States squadron were expected in a few days to join 
		them at Tangier.  The purport 
		of the disturbances did not ascertain. 
		Left the Straits on the 5th of February, in company 
		with the Constitution and Potomac, and saw them enter the harbor of 
		Tangier at & A.M.”   
		(Pages 190-1.) 
		Number
		19 (May 12, 1836) 
		“Correspondence 
		of the Boston Morning Post. 
		                                        
		                                                   "Malta, Feb. 
		9, 1836. 
		“Arrival of the 
		Frigate Constitution at Malta of H.B.M. Steamer Hermes, with Commodore 
		Hull on board—meeting between this officer and Capt. Dacres, now in 
		command of the ‘Edinburgh,’ seventy-four. 
		“At daylight, on the morning of the eleventh of January, from the 
		observatory of the Palace, a large American ship was seen lying off the 
		harbor of Valletta, under easy sail, with the ensign hoisted, and the 
		flag of the Commodore of this station at the fore-royalmasthead. 
		“It was not long before she was made out as the Constitution, with 
		Commodore Elliott on board, which was not altogether uninteresting, 
		although it might not have been at all agreeable news to Capt. J. R. 
		Dacres, who is now in our port, in command of the Edinburgh 
		seventy-four. 
		“No American man-of-war has arrived at our island for a length of time, 
		which has created so much interest among the English commanders, as this 
		ship of which we are now speaking. 
		So much, indeed, did she excite crowds collected on the heights 
		of La Valletta, and on the terraces of the different buildings, to view 
		‘Old Ironsides’ slowly tacking to the westward—both the wind and current 
		being strongly against the course whither she was bound. 
		“There is no better position for observing the ships which may be in 
		sight off Malta, than on the ramparts of St. Elmo, and it was on this 
		spot that a British Post-Captain was seen with his spy-glass, 
		attentively gazing at the ‘Yankee Frigate,’ which, as was truly remarked 
		by him, is the pride of our nation, and as fine a ship of her class as 
		could be seen in any navy. 
		“Not many days after the departure of the Constitution from this place, 
		and while the recollection of her visit was fresh in the minds of those 
		who had been to see her, His B. M. Steamer Hermes arrived from 
		Gibraltar, and among the passengers was Commodore Hull. 
		“Hardly had the ship come to anchor, before Capt. Dacres manned his 
		boat, and called to see his old friend, ‘whom he had formerly known in 
		Boston.’  Their meeting was a 
		very pleasant one; and Capt. Dacres has, since the liberation of the 
		Commodore from quarantine, been almost daily to visit him, carrying his 
		brother commanders, at all times, to introduce them. 
		If the English are of a proud spirit, they have this natural 
		trait of character, that whenever they see a brave man, they respect 
		him; and it matters but little whether they were the once defeated or 
		not, they still show the same attentions, and pay the same deference to 
		such a character, whether it is found in their countrymen, among their 
		friends, or in an enemy. 
		“The truth of this remark can be proved by the treatment which Commodore 
		Hull has received since his arrival in our city. 
		Rear Admiral Sir Thomas Briggs informed the writer that he 
		respected Commodore Hull for his courage as shown to Europe, and should 
		take the first opportunity to call upon him. 
		This he has done with his family, and on these two distinguished 
		officers comparing notes, it was found they were both on this station, 
		and in command of men of war, upwards of thirty years since, and at the 
		time when we were engaged in the Tripoline war. 
		“Among the distinguished men now here, we may name Vice Admiral Josias 
		Rowley, who is in command of the English fleet; the Hon. Capt. Percy, of 
		the Canopas; Capt. Martin, flag captain of the Caledonian; Capt. McKerby, 
		of the Vernon frigate, known as the one-armed captain of Trafalgar, a 
		relation of Capt. Dacres; Sir Frederic Hankey, Chief Secretary to 
		Government, and indeed at this moment acting Governor of the Island; all 
		of whom, but more particularly the last, have been very attentive to 
		Commodore Hull and his family during their tarry among them. “Sir Frederic Hankey took 
		the Commodore to the Garrison Club, where are enrolled the names of all 
		the distinguished persons who have passed through this Island since it 
		was a British possession; and also on 
		the pages of the catalogue will be found the names of several 
		Royal Dukes, and also many of the distinguished of the European nobility 
		and gentry.  Commodore Hull 
		was made an honorary member while a resident in La Valletta, and it 
		gives me much pleasure to state as a countryman, that this gentleman has 
		received all the attention which it was in the power of those in office 
		to show him.  And 
		furthermore, it is with much gratification I am enabled to state, that 
		Capt. J. R. Dacres has always, previous to the arrival of Commodore 
		Hull, and since, spoken of him in the highest terms, which may serve to 
		correct the erroneous impression prevalent in America during the last 
		war, that after the heat of the action had passed away, there 
		always had existed a coolness between the commander of the 
		Guerriere and his powerful adversary of the Constitution. 
		Capt. Dacres was evidently much chagrined at his capture—he feels 
		it to this day, and probably may never entirely recover from the 
		mortification caused by the result of the action between the two ships, 
		-- he is, however, a brave man, of a jovial character, liked by his 
		officers, popular with his equals, and last not least, a friend to the 
		Bostonians, and a lover of their country. 
		He never lets an opportunity pass, without mentioning the 
		hospitality he received when a visitor and resident in the capital of 
		New England.   *    
		*     *    
		* “I do not hesitate to 
		say, that there is no frigate in our service, which will create, on 
		her arrival, half the sensation in our city,, as the ship of 
		which we are now speaking.  
		This remark will shortly be verified to our numerous countrymen on 
		board, as I understand that, ere long, it is the intention of Commodore 
		Elliott to visit our island, and with the American squadron, to remain a 
		short period anchored in our port.”           
		(Pages 292-3.) 
		
		Number 20 (May 19, 1836)
		
		“Sword Manufactory.—The only establishment of this sort in 
		the United States, we understand, is the Ames’s at Cabotville, in 
		Springfield, Mass., where all the swords of the army and navy are now 
		made…”      
		(Page 318.) 
		
		Number 21 (May 26, 1836)
		
		“Frigate Constitution, from Lisbon, was seen off Malaga, on the 15th 
		April, steering E.”            
		(Page 336.) 
		
		Number 22 (June 2, 1836)
		
		“Frigate Constitution, Com. Elliott, sailed for Gibraltar, 19th 
		April, but not being able to enter the mole, bore away for Mahon; was 
		Gibraltar, 21 April.” (Page 352.) 
		Number
		24 (June 16, 1836) 
		“The frigate Constitution sailed from Gibraltar May 1, for Malaga and 
		Mahon…”     
		(Page 364.)   
		
		Volume III
		
		Number
		4 (July 28, 1836) 
		“Frigates Constitution and Potomac, ship John Adams, and schr. Shark, 
		sailed from Toulon on the 1st June, for Naples.”    
		(Page 63.) 
		
		Number 5 (August 4, 1836)
		
		“From the United States Gazette. 
		“Noble Conduct of an American Merchant, to a Wounded Officer of the U. 
		S. Mediterranean Squadron. 
		“Mr. Editor:- In February last, the journals of this city published an 
		account of the desperate wound received by passed Midshipman Barton, in 
		a duel on the 1st Dec., at Smyrna. 
		At the time Mr. Barton was so fortunate as to fall under the 
		professional care of our distinguished fleet surgeon, Dr. Boyd, who 
		extracted the ball in a flattened mass, from the back part of the leg, 
		and after a most kind and resolute effort for his future safety, left 
		him on shore on the 5th of January, in the care of a skillful 
		European surgeon, resident in Smyrna. 
		The skill and conduct of Dr. Boyd, before sailing with the 
		squadron, laid the foundation of the result, which should lead us never 
		to despair of a limb.  The 
		extract below conveys the gratifying account that Mr. Barton’s leg (in 
		jeopardy at one time of amputation from the wound, and other 
		circumstances not now necessary to be mentioned,) [sic] has at length 
		been saved, and not only so, but saved in its entire length 
		and straightness, so that, after a few months, no lameness will 
		remain. 
		“From the noble hospitality and attention, shown by Griffith Stith, 
		Esq., and his amiable family, in receiving Mr. Barton in his forlorn 
		condition, into the bosom of his private family, thus assuaging his 
		sufferings by the immeasurably inexpressible value of disinterested 
		friendship and female sympathy and succour in a foreign land. 
		For such conduct, , the friends of Mr. Barton beg leave thus 
		publicly, to express their deep sense of grateful 
		acknowledgement—publicly, because there is a public view of it. 
		Those who, next to Mr. Barton himself, would feel and appreciate 
		this humane and feeling kindness, have only to say, that such conduct 
		can find no adequate return by the language of thanks, however 
		expressive.  Let anyone, 
		deeply interested by ties of relationship or friendship, or any more 
		tender feeling, in any naval officer, left in a distant foreign port 
		like Smyrna, wounded, alone, unknown but by his disaster and his 
		uniform, imagine the circumstances as if they involved his own feelings 
		and his own friends, then will the heart be found to respond in 
		imagination, in such a way as cannot be portrayed by any words the 
		tongue can utter, or the pen indite. 
		“Mr. Griffith Stith, is an American merchant (from Baltimore, I believe) 
		at present, and for several years past, a resident in Smyrna. 
		I learn from naval officers who have enjoyed his hospitality in 
		that port, that his urbanity and kindness to them and others, has 
		already often received their thanks and respect. 
		I consider that the conduct of this gentleman, is not only to be 
		viewed in its individual aspect of interest with all due praise, but as 
		redounding to the American character abroad, in the eyes of foreigners. 
		I feel assured, that such is the tone of feeling of naval officers on 
		such an occasion (for they are peculiarly sensitive to the character and 
		estimation of their countrymen abroad) that they will take pride as a 
		body, in learning the substantial sympathy evinced by this gentleman to 
		one of their corps. 
		“Mr. Barton also speaks in one of his letters in grateful language of 
		Surgeon Evans, of his Britannic Majesty’s ship Tribune, his consulting 
		surgeon with Dr. Marpurgo, the resident surgeon of Smyrna, of whom he 
		speaks below.  The 
		professional courtesy of English naval surgeons, in absence of our own, 
		is no new occurrence.  Other 
		instances have occurred in which it has conspicuously and beneficially 
		appeared.  It has been as it 
		now is, in the present instance, applauded and respected. 
		Respectfully yours,                                                   
		B. 
		“Extract of a 
		letter, dated Smyrna, April 9th, 1836. 
		“My leg is slowly but surely recovering. 
		It was broken athwartships in three places. 
		Eleven pieces of bone have been extracted, not however of a large 
		size.  I had been one hundred 
		and eighteen days in one position, when quite a large portion of the 
		ball was cut out (this was imbedded amidst the comminuted fragments of 
		the large bone, where Dr. Boyd cut out the main portion of the ball from 
		the back of the leg the day I was wounded, which I presume had passed 
		through the bone, shattering it, and leaving some lead behind.) 
		An orifice three quarters of an inch deep still remains, it being 
		now one hundred and thirty one days since the hurt. 
		My surgeon who has built upon the skillful foundation of Dr. 
		Boyd, has not only saved the limb, but has preserved its length and 
		straightness.  He is quite an 
		enthusiast, and says it is not worth while to save a life, and have a 
		crooked leg.  I beg you to do 
		me the favor to write a letter of thanks in your warmest terms, to 
		Griffin Stith, Esq. an American merchant in whose house I am residing. 
		He has overwhelmed me with kindness and attention; and his 
		amiable and estimable wife, and his beautiful daughter you could not say 
		too much.  The gratitude of a 
		poor isolated being like myself, though my heart swells with it to 
		overflowing, is far too small an offering for a family such as this. 
		CHARLES CRILLON BARTON. » 
		
		(Pages 77-8.) 
		
		Number 6 (August 11, 1836)
		
		“Frigates Constitution and Potomac, and ship John Adams, arrived at 
		Leghorn, 17th June.:                
		               (Page 93.) 
		
		Number 7 (August 18, 1836)
		
		“Commodore Elliott and Passed Midshipman Barton.- Having some time ago, 
		at the request of a correspondent, published a letter, censuring the 
		conduct of Commodore Elliott towards Passed Midshipman Barton, after he 
		was wounded in the duel with Mr. Wood, we feel bound in justice to 
		publish the following defence [sic] of Commodore Elliott from the New 
		York Times. 
		“The American squadron in the Mediterranean has for the last eight or 
		nine months been kept in a state of more constant and useful activity 
		than it has been known before for years. 
		Instead of lying in listless idleness during the winter at Mahon, 
		with the want of occupation driving the younger officers and men to 
		dissipation, it has been in almost continual motion, visiting all parts 
		of that sea, with one or more vessels looking in at every principal port 
		every few weeks, and by this exhibiting itself constantly, sustaining 
		the influence of our government agents, maintaining the security of our 
		commerce and the respect due to our flag. 
		Incessant attention has been paid to the health and comforts of 
		the men, the ships are kept in the highest state of discipline, and the 
		squadron is probably more efficient for its strength than it has been 
		before since we had one in those seas. 
		The commander is, in the words of a letter before us, 
		‘wonderfully alive to the interests of his country; he never tires, nor 
		allows an opportunity of promoting them to escape. 
		The strong feeling of prejudice that existed against him when he 
		took the command, has been entirely changed, by his high-minded, liberal 
		course, and more than one of these officers who at first declared that 
		they would leave the squadron as soon as they could, now say they will 
		apply for his ship when he changes his flag to the North 
		Carolina.’  His care for the 
		morals and improve of the younger officers has been incessant, and he 
		has taken much pains to prevent all dissipation, above all to 
		discountenance dueling. 
		His orders on the latter subject have from the first been strict 
		and judicious, and strictly enforced. 
		This, duty and the rules of the service required. 
		“We speak this on the testimony of officers, both those who were friends 
		of the commander, and those who were not, and we feel the firmest 
		conviction of the accuracy of these statements. 
		We take this occasion to make them, because a news series is now 
		opened of those malignant newspaper attacks upon that officer, prompted 
		by personal and political spite, that we had occasion to notice last 
		year.  The course he found 
		himself compelled to take in reference to a duel between two midshipmen 
		at Smyrna is made the theme of them, and coarse and abusive epithets 
		seem likely to be exhausted on him. 
		Brutality, cowardice, meanness of spirit, cruelty, tyranny, &c., 
		are imputed we see in one article alone in the Courier & Enquirer. 
		It is but justice to make the facts in that case known, and the 
		public may then judge how far censure is due to the commander. 
		“Duelling was most strictly forbidden in the squadron, as the laws 
		require.  The Shark needed a 
		midshipman, and one was detached to her from the Constitution—Mr. Wood. 
		Mr. Barton, of the latter vessel, had a former quarrel with Wood, 
		and now renewed it, prevented his being received into the mess, and 
		determined to drive him out the ship, or out of the service, ultimately 
		forced him in the most tyrannical manner into a duel, Wood having 
		avoided it as long as possible. 
		Barton was wounded in the lower part of the leg, and instead of 
		being taken to his own vessel, as he should have been, was carried 
		without orders or permission, to the frigate, where, at the intercession 
		of the surgeon, the first lieutenant reluctantly admitted him on board 
		until the commodore, who was ashore, should return. 
		“The case presented to that officer must then have been this: a 
		midshipman, inimical to another, resolves to drive him from the ship to 
		which they belong, and at length forces him into a duel, in open and 
		daring violation and the standing and special regulations; the aggressor 
		is wounded, is brought for his greater comfort to the flag ship. 
		What was the commodore to do? 
		To permit him to remain there would be to sanction his conduct, 
		to offer a premium for dueling, to invite neglect of orders and 
		discipline.  On the other 
		hand the surgeon declares that it may be dangerous to remove him. 
		The commodore directs that he be removed to his own ship, lying 
		close by—and when permission is asked afterwards to take him ashore, he 
		grants it.  This is a just 
		statement of the case—and these are the facts upon which all the abuse 
		of the Courier is founded.  
		Now let every fair man judge for himself whether the commodore could or 
		ought to have done otherwise than he did, and whether there was any 
		thing of cruelty, tyranny, &c., in his course. 
		For our parts, we think he would be unworthy of his commission, 
		of his present important trust, if he had not been capable of lending 
		countenance to such conduct as marked this case, or overlooking such a 
		violation of order and discipline. 
			“We have no 
			will to censure the course of Barton; we regret the suffering which 
			he brought upon himself, and we are inclined to look upon it as 
			sufficient retribution; we may rejoice too at the generous 
			hospitality that was shown him. That was a matter of course however, 
			among the American and European residents of Smyrna, and as to any 
			peculiar hardship in his case, we cannot see it. 
			He was attended for thirty-five days, until all difficulty 
			was over, by the fleet surgeon; that he was left at Smyrna was a 
			kindness, as the ship was far less comfortable, and for the rest, he 
			had but an ordinary gunshot wound to endure. 
			We publish cheerfully the letters below, bearing testimony to 
			the noble kindness of a Mr. Stith, and we regret that the political 
			and personal enemies of Commodore Elliott have made Mr. Barton’s 
			case an occasion for renewing their calumnies upon that officer, and 
			thus forced out an exposition of the circumstances which otherwise 
			would certainly have been withheld.—New York Times…….” 
			 
 
		“The explanation given in this paper, a day or two ago of the affair 
		between Midshipmen Barton and Wood at Smyrna, and of the proceedings of 
		the Commodore in relation to it, which have been blamed as harsh and 
		improper, was possibly sufficient to satisfy every fair observer of the 
		injustice of that censure.  
		We should therefore not advert to the subject again, but that we have 
		received some express testimony relating to it, with a request that it 
		should be given to the public. 
		It is contained in a letter from an officer of high standing and 
		character, who joined the squadron since the occurrence in question, who 
		is a well known and universally respected in this city, and whose name, 
		though we do not insert it here, is at the service of any who choose to 
		inquire for it.  It will be 
		seen that the conduct of the Commodore, so far from being ‘cruel, 
		tyrannical, brutal, &c.’ as the Courier has described it, was 
		particularly kind and generous: and we trust that the paper, having made 
		such imputations, will satisfy itself of the authenticity of the 
		following indication, and lay it before its readers. 
		“It is proper to state in addition to what is given below, which we do 
		on other authority, that the request of the fleet surgeon to have Mr. 
		Barton on board the flagship was made in order that he might attend him 
		the more conveniently.  It 
		could not have been from any danger in which the patient stood; gunshot 
		wounds in the lower part of the leg are not very serious though they may 
		be long in healing. *   
		*    *   
		*    *   
		* -- “Both before and since leaving the United States I have seen 
		strictures in the newspapers upon Commodore Elliott in relation to the 
		affair between passed midshipmen Barton and Wood. 
		I was determined that whenever I joined the Constitution, I would 
		enquire into the truth of the story in order to satisfy my own mind, and 
		find the result as follows: ‘I hope, my dear Sir, that a love for candor and truth will induce you to correct the aspersions which have recently been published, and have given an undue consequence to the transaction. * * * * *. 
 By 
		some management with a launch officer, the parties got on shore, the 
		meeting took place, and Mr. Barton as you know was wounded. 
		By the advice of his attending surgeon he was brought alongside 
		the flag ship and admitted at the Doctor’s solicitation, although at 
		first refused by the 1st Lieutenant. 
		On the Commodore’s return on board, the affair was reported to 
		him, when he ordered Mr. Barton to return to his own vessel, being 
		determined to discountenance those proceedings among his young 
		officers—particularly upon slight and trivial grounds. 
		The fleet surgeon was informed, that it was impossible Mr. Barton 
		could remain on board the flag-ship, but that if he could not be 
		comfortable on board his own vessel, he might be taken on shore, which 
		was accordingly done, using for that purpose the largest and best boat 
		belonging to the ship, in order that he might suffer no inconvenience 
		from the removal.  A man from 
		the schooner was sent ashore to attend him, and the fleet surgeon 
		requested to visit him as long as the ship remained in port. 
		The Commodore thought from the nature of the wound that a long 
		and tedious confinement was unavoidable, and a ship of war was no fit 
		place for a sick man, the vessel too, being under the momentary 
		expectation of going to sea.  
		Every article belonging to the surgical department of the schooner, that 
		was requested for his use, was sent him, and in fact every attention 
		paid him, that could in any manner relieve his situation. 
		Two months’ pay in advance was left him with a letter of credit 
		upon the schooner, and he was placed under the care of Mr. Offley, the 
		American consul—a personal and valued friend of he Commodore; with an 
		excellent surgeon to attend him until the schooner should return and 
		take him on board.  As I said 
		before, the Commodore is determined to discountenance duels in 
		the squadron, particularly among the midshipmen, whose guardian he looks 
		upon himself to be, having the care of their morals and feeling a deep 
		interest in their future welfare, and although he discountenances duels 
		among ourselves originating in trivial causes—he is the last man in my 
		opinion that would wish an officer to yield a point of honor, but would 
		rather assist him in maintaining it. 
		As you will perceive, the charge of harsh treatment towards Mr. 
		Barton is not, nor can it be, sustained. 
			
			     ‘In 
			no ship or squadron that I have seen or heard of, have I known more 
			indulgence extended to the officers, giving them every opportunity 
			to visit foreign places, and travelling, and if they choose, to 
			improve their minds by study. 
			There are at this moment four of our officers traveling in 
			France and Spain, but expected to join us in a few days by the Shark 
			daily expected from Marseilles, viz., Dr. Woodworth, passed 
			midshipman Drayton, midshipmen Middleton and Jenkins. 
			Although the officers are allowed all proper indulgences, the 
			Commodore is sensitive to all infringements of duty or discipline. 
			There never was a ship probably, in better order or 
			discipline than the Constitution, and the other vessels comprising 
			the squadron are all in excellent order. 
			This seems to be universally admitted wherever we go. 
			Make use of the information I give you, as you 
			please—although I would not like my name to figure in print exactly, 
			yet I hold myself responsible for its truth.’”—N. Y. Times, July 
			26. 
		“ From the New 
		York Times, July 30. 
		“The following letter comes to us without the name of the writer, but 
		that does not prevent our readily giving it place, the rather as we have 
		found reason to suspect that his statement may be correct as to our 
		transposing the names of the parties. 
		“Our remark that we were unwilling to censure the course of Mr. Barton 
		referred to the act which led to his transfer from his own ship to the 
		Shark, and not to his controversy with Mr. Wood. 
		To the Editors. 
		“Gentlemen—The writer of this has this moment seen your editorial 
		remarks (July 23d,) preceding the republication of Mr. Barton’s letter 
		from Smyrna and its accompanying preface. 
		There is neither the desire nor intention in this communication 
		to cavil at, or in any way reply to, any portion of those remarks, 
		further than as they contain a gross misstatement of Mr. Barton’s 
		conduct, into which you have been doubtless led, either by 
		misinformation, or what is more probable, by some confusion in the names 
		of the parties; for with the interchange of the names, your statement 
		would be nearly correct.  Mr. 
		Barton was no farther the aggressor in the affair at Smyrna, than by the
		single act of his being challenger. 
		His opponent it was (who belonged to the vessel to which 
		Mr. Barton had just been ordered) who showed such outrageous conduct 
		towards Mr. Barton, which you attribute to him as his 
		course towards the other; and it was this outrageous conduct 
		which caused Mr. Barton to call out the officer (his enemy by a 
		previous quarrel), who had thus insulted him. 
		You perceive the truth is the reverse of your statement. 
		“Common justice to Mr. Barton will, the writer of this feels assured, 
		induce you in your next paper, to rectify your ‘exposition of the case 
		of Mr. Barton.’  Thus 
		removing through the same channel which created it, the source of public 
		error into which it is believed you have inadvertently led that public. 
		You will readily admit. that whatever view you may deem proper to 
		take of Commodore Elliott’s treatment of Mr. Barton, the latter should 
		not be the sufferer in public estimation by any misstatement arising 
		from inaccurate information or any confusion in the story. 
		“The facts as stated in this communication, were published in February 
		last in the public prints, and it is believed in your own paper, the 
		Times, among the rest.  As to 
		your remark, (predicated on your error as just noticed) that you ‘have 
		no will to censure the course of Barton, you regret the suffering he has 
		brought upon himself, and you are inclined to look upon it as sufficient 
		retribution,’ the writer of this has only to say, that he committed no 
		act as an aggressor, except that of giving challenge, in the propriety 
		of which he was borne out by all the officers of the squadron. 
		He has never complained of his sufferings, as far as they arose 
		from the wound and the surgical operations. 
		He knew the chance game of mortal conflict, and does not now, nor 
		did he repine at any moment, at being the loser in the affair; but he 
		did and does complain, and loudly too of his 
		sufferings bodily and mental, from a cause extraneous to either the 
		wound or the operations, and his complaint has reached the government. 
		Whether in this complaint he has met the sympathy of the Navy 
		universally, and the public as universally, it is no intention of 
		the writer here to assert.  
		You Sir, as well as every other editor or individual, can interrogate 
		naval officers, of all grades, and ascertain the tone of their feelings 
		on this point. 
		“Philadelphia, 
		July 27, 1836.”    
		(Pages 102-3.) 
		Number
		9 (September 1, 1836) 
			
			     “On 
			our first page to-day, will be found some very severe remarks from 
			the New York Courier and Enquirer, respecting the outrageous conduct 
			of Commodore Elliott towards Midshipman Barton, in the 
			Mediterranean.  We have 
			expunged some of the more violent sentences, as not of moment in the 
			discussion; and with what remains, we believe the public fully 
			agree.  We are happy to 
			congratulate Mr. Barton and his friends, as well as the great number 
			of strangers who feel a deep interest in the young officer on 
			account of the unmanly treatment which he has received, upon his 
			release from the control of Elliott. 
			We learn, that in consequence of an earnest desire expressed 
			by himself and friends, to the Navy Department, the Secretary of the 
			Navy has within a few days past, directed Com. Elliott ‘to transfer 
			Mr. Barton to the first public vessel returning to the United 
			States.’  His 
			emancipation from the domineering thraldom [sic] of such a 
			courageous and humane commander, will be hailed with 
			rejoicing by every one who loves the navy. 
			In truth, the conduct of Elliott in this instance, deserved 
			the investigation of a court martial. We trust that immediately on 
			his return, Mr. Barton will prefer his complaint personally to the 
			Secretary of the Navy.  
			This, with characteristic magnanimity, he may perhaps decline. Dr. 
			Boyd, who is also relieved, has cause quite sufficient to arraign 
			Elliott for an unofficer-like infringement of his rights. 
			We sincerely hope that the Secretary of the Navy will be 
			beforehand with both these officers, by voluntarily ordering a court 
			of inquiry, to overhaul Elliott’s behaviour, which, if we may judge 
			from the almost unanimous voice of the press, has deeply offended 
			the people at large.  
			There is a feeling of humanity in the public, which is hurt by such 
			barbarism as that of Commodore Elliott, and as to the officers of 
			the navy, high and low, there can be but one opinion among them, 
			on the subject.—Philadelphia Gazette, Aug. 12.” 
		“From the N. Y. 
		Courier and Enquirer.      
		 
		“As we intimated some days since we have been put in possession of 
		authentic evidence of Elliott’s conduct, which oversets entirely the 
		lame though labored defence [sic] of that person in the Times, and which 
		must make him even more odious with every right feeling American citizen 
		than he has been heretofore.  
		The facts which we now submit to the public, rest upon no vague 
		authority; the main incidents are verified by letters now on file in the 
		Navy Department, of which we have been shown notarial copies. 
		There is no mistake, no misrepresentation in the case. 
		The black-hearted and malignant sea tyrant has seen fit to 
		‘assume the responsibility,’ and we hope and trust will be made to 
		suffer for it before his peers in a court martial—at least before his 
		peers in official station; his peers in personal profligacy and 
		meanness, are not to be found in the United States Navy. 
		The following facts in relation to this case, are derived from 
		sources that leave the cowardly despot and his friends no 
		possibility of cavil or contradiction. 
		It must be borne in mind that the prominent incident in the 
		defence put forth in the Times is proved to be utterly false, as indeed 
		has been virtually acknowledged by that paper itself in a subsequent 
		article on the subject.  
		Midshipman Barton, so far from being the aggressor, was in fact the 
		aggrieved and insulted party. 
		A pretty apologist for Elliott, the Times is, truly, when in 
		making out its case, it actually falsifies the whole statement by 
		substituting Midshipman Barton for the officer who was the cause of the 
		contest!      
		“Mr. Barton had long been an applicant for orders to the Constitution, 
		before the commander had been disignated [sic]. 
		He received them, sailed one cruise (to England and France,) in 
		her with Commodore Elliott, who, at Cherbourg, found this officer’s 
		talents for draughting and painting useful to him, and he freely called 
		them into requisition.  On 
		the return of the frigate, Mr. B. was among the very last of the many 
		officers who sought to be detached from her. 
		He had been on excellent terms with the Commodore, but did not 
		admire or respect him.  The 
		answer of the Secretary of the Navy to Mr. B. was, ‘that as the 
		commander of the frigate was opposed to the measure, he could not grant 
		his (Mr. Barton’s) request.’  
		Deeply mortified at being obliged to sail with him again, he determined 
		to put the smoothest face possible on the matter—showed no displeasure, 
		nor did he give the slightest cause by any official neglect or 
		misconduct for any displeasure towards him on the part of the commodore, 
		who again made requisitions on his graphic talents (which are of the 
		first order.)  Mr. Barton had 
		received the impression that his drawings were intended for the Navy 
		Department.  Finding at 
		Mahon, his error, ‘he resolved never more to put pencil to paper for the 
		commodore.’  Accordingly, the 
		next time he was called on to make drawings (no part of his duty, and a 
		mere courtesy, already often rendered this commander,) he politely 
		declined any further extra-official exercise and labor of this kind for 
		the private purpose of the commander: but at the same time 
		declared his services at Commodore Elliott’s command for the Navy 
		Department, or any public use. 
		Perhaps this gave umbrage to Commodore Elliott, - but he 
		had no right nor any reason to take any. 
		Up to the period of the arrival of the Constitution at Smyrna, no 
		fault was found with Mr. Barton’s official conduct by Commodore Elliott. 
		He had neither been notified of any neglect of duty, nor charged 
		with any official remissness, nor suspended, nor reprimanded. 
		In a word, as an officer, he was now the same as he had all along 
		been, and that Commodore Elliott thought him an efficient and a good one 
		of his class, is manifest from what must be considered a compliment to 
		him—his having refused to part with him on a second 
		cruise, when he had already had such knowledge of his talents and 
		abilities and gentlemanly deportment as a first cruise had given 
		him.  But now, he ordered Mr. 
		B. to the schr. Shark, where the advantages were of far less extension; 
		and to him it was particularly hard to leave the frigate to which he had 
		been especially appointed by the Secretary of the Navy, and to repair on 
		board a small vessel to which he would not have been ordered by the 
		department, in the U.S.; having already served in a schooner; and in 
		fact, had only served a year and four months in a frigate, all the time 
		he has been in the navy, since 1824; having all the rest of the time 
		served in small vessels.  But 
		he was also ordered under restrictions, on board the schooner; being 
		deprived of indulgences his colleagues possessed. 
		Notwithstanding all this, Mr. Barton hesitated not to obey the 
		order, and repaired on board the Shark, where his enemy was an officer 
		of his own grade, but senior to him. 
		That ill blood existed between these officers, was made known to 
		Com. Elliott by the captain of the schooner, and that the almost certain 
		result would be a duel—and all this in time, too, for Commodore Elliott, 
		had he been so desirous of quelling duelling in midshipmen, to have 
		substituted some other in his place—if indeed it was a fact, that 
		the Shark was in need of a passed midshipman, which is mere assertion by 
		the ‘Times,’ and remains to be proved. 
		There is no doubt, however, of the right of Commodore Elliott to 
		have ordered Mr. Barton, despite of all these circumstances, on board 
		the schooner, if he chose to exercise that right—and in time of war or 
		exigency, it is certain such considerations of a private nature ought 
		not to interfere with the public good of the service—but in time of 
		peace, with such a peaceful commodore, so overwhelmingly 
		anxious and determined to repress dueling, it is marvelous that so 
		good an opportunity of preventing this unfortunate affair, by keeping 
		the parties separated as the Navy Department had by accident separated 
		them, was allowed to pass by. 
		     “The duel 
		did take place which was predicted. 
		In the absence of Commodore Elliott, the second and surgeon of 
		Mr. Barton, at his own request, took him on board of the 
		Constitution, for the purpose of having the ball extracted by the fleet 
		surgeon.  Was anything more 
		natural than that Mr. Barton should not wish to be carried on board the 
		Shark, to be placed night and day in the sight and hearing of his 
		antagonist, within 8 or 10 feet square, (the size of the steerage of a 
		schooner) to have his wounds probed, and all his sufferings witnessed by 
		him.  He preferred rather to 
		throw himself on the generous feelings of his commander, who so well 
		knew the necessary comforts for a wounded officer, that it is said he 
		had exhibited a sick cot prepared on board of his own, this very 
		frigate, at New York, in case Col. Towson should have wounded him. 
		But the comforts a commodore might require, could be dispensed 
		with by a young officer.  It
		has never been heard of, till the ‘Times’ published it on the 26th 
		ult., that the first lieutenant of the Constitution had at first refused 
		to receive the wounded officer. 
		Nothing of the kind is mentioned in the full letters of 
		Mr. Barton’s second, or in that of the fleet surgeon, Dr. Boyd; both of 
		which letters are on file in the Navy Department nor has a single 
		officer from the squadron mentioned it. 
		It is known to be usual in the service, in cases of danger from 
		diseases or other cause, to remove even an officer from a small 
		confined vessel to a larger one, if it is thought his life may be thus 
		saved.  
		Lieutenant {Andrew A.} 
		Harwood is at this time sent from this very 
		Shark to this very Constitution, sick: so says a letter from the 
		squadron, just received.  The 
		fleet surgeon did not merely wish Mr. Barton kept on board the 
		Constitution for the convenience of attending him. 
		Dr. Boyd is not a man to prefer his own convenience to that of 
		his patient’s ease and safety. 
		He ‘protested,’ as the fleet surgeon, against his removal 
		any where at that time, just after the painful extraction of the ball,
		because such removal would jeopard limb, and even life. 
		To the Shark he was ordered and taken, and such were his 
		sufferings, that while they were hoisting him out of the frigate and 
		sending him in a boat to be hoisted again into the schooner, the old 
		tars who witnessed it were shocked, and gave unequivocal and feminine 
		proof of their sympathy.  
		This is stated in a private letter from a highly respectable officer on 
		board at the time to his family in Pennsylvania. 
		The authority of that officer could not be doubted by any one. 
		It is positively certain that all the letters from the 
		squadron at the time, gave the most feeling and condemnatory account of 
		Commo. Elliott’s treatment of Mr. B. 
		It is positively untrue, as ascribed in the Times of the 26th 
		ult., that there was no danger, or could have been none, as ‘gun shot 
		wounds in the lower part of the leg are not very serious, though they 
		may be long in healing.’  
		In the first place this was, according to Dr. Boyd, in the upper 
		part of the leg, two and a half inches below the knee; the fracture was 
		comminuted, the fragments of broken bone numerous, and no surgeon of any 
		reputation would say Mr. Barton was not in danger of limb and life. 
		Dr. Boyd thought so, and used that argument to induce Commo. 
		Elliott to arrest his inhuman order for carrying him up the hatchways 
		and swinging him out of the ship. 
		But the nature of the case, as detailed by Mr. Barton’s letter 
		already published, proves the great danger in which he stood. 
		Dr. Boyd positively states in his letter which is on file 
		in the Navy Department, that Mr. Barton’s case was made worse by 
		Commodore Elliott subjecting him to two 
		removals. 
		“It was Dr. Boyd’s intercession with Com. Elliott that finally induced 
		the latter to permit his removal on shore—for Dr. Boyd could not see him 
		annoyed in mind and aggravated in his inevitable sufferings, by being 
		cramped up in a space with six or seven officers, of eight or ten feet 
		square.  As for the two 
		months advance pay, which the writer says was left him, with a letter of 
		credit on the schooner—admit it, this was as it should have been. 
		But does the writer of the letter pretend to insinuate that from
		Commodore Elliott this emanated? or [sic] if it did, is Commodore 
		Elliott so silly as to claim merit for it? 
		In the first place it was none of his business, but that of the 
		Purser of the Shark; in the second, it is no wide assertion to say that 
		our navy does not possess a purser who would have to consult a commodore 
		about such a matter for an officer in such a situation. 
		From the purser of the Shark then—the only responsible person in 
		the business—this necessary accommodation came—and if Commodore Elliott 
		chose to be officious, it was needless, for the reason just stated. 
		No purser of the navy requires a lesson from Commodore Elliott 
		on the course of feeling and propriety in such a case! 
		The following is an extract from a letter from Mr. Barton: 
		     “’I was 
		taken at my request on board the Constitution, wishing that good—that 
		excellent man, Dr. Boyd, to extract the ball; which he truly did 
		secundum artem.  Hardly 
		was it out, before Commodore Elliott ordered me peremptorily out of the 
		ship.  I was in great 
		agony—had taken opium, and required as much rest and quietude as could 
		be given me—but despite all this and the Doctor’s energetic 
		remonstrances against the act—in fact, despite his official protest 
		as fleet surgeon, stating the danger of both limb and life, I was 
		hoisted over the side as a quantity of purser’s pots, pans, and stores, 
		with a broken and shattered leg—the blood gushing madly through the 
		bandages—and the pain—merciful God! the see-saw motion of a yard 
		and stay, can only faintly be imagined -- 
		certainly not described. 
		The apartments of a schooner you well know are not as commodious 
		as those of a frigate—so you may suppose the inevitable torture of a 
		broken limb was not considerably improved in so small a space. 
		Nevertheless, after four or five days durance in the Shark’s 
		mud hole, and as a mere act of charity, Commodore Elliott consented 
		to my removal, and here I am in Smyrna, sixty-eight days on my back, the 
		squadron having long since sailed for Malta and Gibraltar.’ 
		“Mr. Barton attributes Commodore Elliott’s conduct to him, to his 
		refusal to continue to paint pictures and draughts of battles for him. 
		I have myself seen, in this city, a letter from an officer to 
		another, who says, “Commodore Elliott’s outrageous and inhuman conduct 
		to Barton was without cause except that he refused to paint for 
		him.’  Another officer from 
		the squadron passed through this city, and corroborates this idea—that 
		‘Barton had offended the commodore by saying he was called on as if a 
		drawing master.’ “A 
		most magnanimous cause for persecuting an officer!! -- driving him by an 
		order out of the ship to which he had been especially appointed, 
		after long solicitation, to an inferior place—forcing him thus into 
		a duel—then having him carried up the hatchways and swinging him over 
		the side of the frigate, at a critical time of his hurt, to a miserable 
		place not large enough to swing a cat, in which five or six officers 
		were dwelling—an officer who had committed no official fault or 
		misdemeanor!!! -- an officer who stands accredited in the records of the 
		Navy Department, by numerous letters, (being one from every commander he 
		has heretofore sailed with, and all under whose command he had been on 
		shore,) giving him the most unqualified testimonials of good conduct, 
		gentlemanly deportment, and officer-like demeanor. 
		He has never been arrested, nor suspended, since he has been in 
		the navy (12 years) for any misconduct, saving a mere pro forma 
		proceeding by way of official discountenance, when he fought a duel in 
		the West Indies, two years ago. 
		In that affair he was he challenged party. 
		Should such a young man, possessing the accredited character as 
		an officer, and one of the best habits, possessing undoubted talents, 
		and various accomplishments, with the fault, perhaps, of being a little 
		too impetuous and daring, but brave, open and generous hearted.-- 
		Should such a one, a mere youth, (23 years) be thus dealt with? 
		Refused admission into a mess, and of course resenting the 
		insult—is inhumanly treated by his official guardian. 
		Can such in the navy be ‘without our especial wonder?’ 
		All the rules and usages for the 
		government of the navy, dwell upon humanity to sick and disabled 
		men and officers, to captains and others. 
		It is a fact, that Commodore Elliott had no right to 
		contest the fleet surgeon’s wishes. 
		He was appointed by the President as fleet surgeon, 
		as omnipotent in his department as a commander in his—that is, his word 
		and wishes should have been laws with the commodore, unless it was 
		positively impracticable to execute those wishes for his patient.”  
		(Pages 129-131.) 
		     “The 
		Constitution, Potomac, John Adams, and Shark, were at Naples on the 5th 
		July; would sail in a few days for Corfu, where they expected to meet 
		the frigate United States.  
		The greatest health and harmony prevailed in the squadron.”  
		(Page 143.) 
		Number 18 
		(November 3, 1836) 
		
		                                   
		“Correspondence of the Boston Morning Post. 
		
		Malta, September 2, 1836
		
		     “This 
		morning I received a letter from a friend at Athens, from which I 
		extract the following, respecting the movements of the American squadron 
		under Commodore Elliott:-- ‘On the 19th ult. Our squadron 
		consisting of the Constitution, Potomac, Captain Nicholson, and John 
		Adams, Capt. Stringham, anchored at Piraeus—and on the 21st 
		August, the frigate United States, Capt. Wilkinson, joined them. 
		The squadron touched at Napoli, and remained three days previous 
		to their coming to this place. 
		I regret to add that Commodore Elliott was too unwell to leave 
		his cabin, having taken a severe cold at Corfu. 
		The Commodore, during his stay, was introduced to the heads of 
		the different departments, and received every attention from them—all of 
		whom, on their going on board the flag ship, were received with the 
		customary honors, and salutes due their rank. 
		     “The 
		squadron left here on the night of the 25th ult., for Sada [Souda], 
		in Crete, from whence they mean to go to the coasts of Syria and 
		Alexandria, and thence to Malta. 
		     “….Dr. Boyd, fleet 
		surgeon, has gone home in the Potomac, and Lt. Bullus, (flag lt.) has 
		gone to Mahon for his health…”  
		(Page 287.) 
		 
		Number
		20 (November 17, 1836) 
		 
		“The frigates Constitution, and United States, and 
		sloop John Adams were at Smyrna, Sept. 3.”   
		(Page 320.) 
		
		Volume IV
		
		Number
		10 (March 9, 1837) 
		 
		“From the 
		Shipping Gazette.—In the Shipping Gazette of the 9th instant, 
		our Falmouth correspondent reported that the schooner Perseverance, of 
		Brixham, on her voyage from Cadiz to Dublin and Liverpool, had been 
		towed back to Cadiz by the United States frigate Constitution, totally 
		dismasted and a complete wreck. 
		Our Brixham correspondent informs us that a general meeting of 
		the Shipping Association of that port was held a few days since, at 
		which a resolution of thanks was voted to Commodore Elliott, for his 
		enterprising and disinterested conduct in saving the ship and crew. 
		We most cheerfully comply with the request made to us by the 
		gentlemen of the Association, to publish Commodore Elliott’s letter to 
		the British Consul at Cadiz, communicating the fact of his having 
		carried the Perseverance into that port, and we are quite sure that the 
		generous sentiments which it breathes, will be duly appreciated and 
		responded to by every British heart: 
		     
		                                                         ‘U. S. 
		Frigate Constitution, Dec. 1836
		
		   
		‘Sir:  At sea, on the 
		22d instant, I fell in with a vessel, crippled and entirely dismasted. 
		She proved to be the schooner Perseverance, of Dartmouth, Captain 
		Adams, who had left Cadiz on the 7th, laden with wine, and 
		bound for Liverpool.  It blew 
		a strong gale, and I was unable to communicate with her by trumpet or 
		boarding.  I veered her a 
		hawser, the prompt acceptance of which on the part of the captain cannot 
		but be approved of by all who are interested. 
		A strong east wind prevailing, I took her in tow for Lisbon. 
		The wind came out adverse, the gale shifting, and the sea making 
		a high breach over her, a flag of distress was hoisted; the wind proved 
		more adverse within thirty miles of Lisbon. 
		I bore up for this port, and now take pleasure in bringing the 
		vessel here without further injury, since she was taken in tow. 
		The persevering industry of the captain entitles him to the kind 
		consideration of the owners.  
		It affords me pleasure, sir, to deliver her into your hands, and the 
		more so in being the providential instrument of rendering assistance to 
		a vessel bearing the flag of a nation to whom we are allied by ties of 
		language, and the many pleasing recollections of mutual intercourse. 
		    
		‘I am, very respectfully, sir, your obedient servant, 
		
		                                                                                                            
		‘ J. D. Elliott
		
		‘Commanding the 
		United States forces in the Mediterranean and                                                           
		 
		
		adjacent Islands.   ‘To J. M. Brackenburgh, 
		Esq. 
		‘His Britannic 
		Majesty’s Consul, Cadiz.’”  
		(Page 146.) 
		Number
		14 (April 6, 1837) 
		“From the Boston Atlas. PRESENTATION OF 
		PLATE TO COMMODORE ELLIOTT BY HIS CREW. 
		“It as once a 
		proud distinction to an officer to receive a sword, or medal, or service 
		of plate, as an honorary reward—for formerly it was the reward of merit, 
		and being bestowed by honor-giving hands, conferred high honor upon the 
		subject.  But in the present 
		case it is a pitiful mockery, and smacks more of avaricious baseness on 
		the one part, and of servile adulation on the other.  
		 
		“It is but of 
		late years we have heard of presents being made by the crews of our 
		national ships to their officers, whilst still under their command; and 
		thus unmilitary, and as it appears to us, mercenary abuse should be 
		visited with the severest reprobation; since we think it fraught with 
		the most pernicious effects to the character and prestige of our 
		naval service, to the discipline and efficiency of our ships, and to the 
		integrity of the officers.  
		It is almost open bribery; a kind of propitiatory oblation, made by a 
		powerless number of men, to the good or evil genius who is for a time 
		still to reign over them with most absolute dominion. 
		“With the 
		exception of life and death, a commander’s power over his crew is 
		despotic; they are absolutely at his mercy; he is restrained by no 
		direct responsibility in his conduct towards his crew, and whatever his 
		caprice or his cruelty may devise, the sufferers have no appeal while 
		under his command.  They can 
		scarcely be called free agents, but merely slaves without the name; and 
		as we intend to show are generally prompted to such acts of humbling 
		servility, by some creature or ‘toady’ of the commander. 
		As well might plantation slaves refuse paying some mark of homage 
		to their master when prompted so to do by their drivers—perhaps at the 
		master’s own suggestion—as a ship’s crew     
		when similarly prompted by some of their commander’s familiars. 
		“Now as it is 
		the pernicious principle involved in these gifts to commanders that we 
		wish to attack, and caring nothing about Commodore Elliott’s plate, his 
		crew, or himself, except as they illustrate the principle—we will 
		suppose a case, to show in what manner these presents are obtained from 
		a ship’s crew; and confident in our knowledge of this modus operandi, 
		we challenge any one conversant with naval matters to deny the facts, or 
		to show our statements unfounded. 
		“One of our 
		national ships is in a foreign port. 
		Her commander being ashore, sees a magnificent vase for sale in a 
		Jeweller’s shop.  It 
		particularly takes his fancy—he inspects it with a longing eye—considers 
		how greatly it would add to  
		the splendor of his sideboard—how it would delight his wife, and be the 
		envy of his acquaintances at home. 
		He wants it hugely—but alas! Its price id $900, and he is already 
		in debt on the purser’s books! 
		What’s to be done?  
		When a vessel cannot sail direct to her port against the wind, a 
		well worked traverse will often fetch up with it. 
		Hold your luff, Commodore, we’ll round the bows of that useful 
		instrument, your very intelligent coxswain! 
		He is a man of weight and influence among your crew! he [sic] is 
		a ‘ship’s lawyer,’ and may unravel this knotty yarn to your 
		satisfaction.  The coxswain 
		has taken the hint—he is on the forecastle with a group of the leading 
		men around him—he fires a few blank cartridges to try their metal—all’s 
		well—slap goes his full broadside, round shot, grape, and canister—‘What 
		say you my lads? come [sic] let’s put in for it—only a couple of dollars 
		or so—that’s nothing—and make the old skipper a present of it—shan’t 
		lose anything by it in the long run, you know—for says he to me, Brown, 
		says he, I mean to do a great deal for the men, if only they try to 
		please me—they are all fine fellows, says he, and that’s a fact. 
		That’s when he was looking at the shiner—and I was standing ‘long 
		side of him.  Mass! but [sic] 
		it is fine tho’—How that would set off the old barky’s cabin, says he—so 
		it would, says I—but  says 
		he, can’t afford it, Brown, can’t afford it—I’m poorer than any man on 
		board the ship.  That’s what 
		the old skipper said—now I’ve a mind boys we put in for it and make him 
		a present of it—he’ll take it, I know—then, shipmates, look out for good 
		times for the rest of the cruise.’ 
		“If on shore 
		masses of men are easily moved in any direction by certain adroit 
		wire-pullers, on board ship a crew of unreflecting, simple-minded 
		sailors are still more easily impelled. 
		Any novelty is popular, and impulses that effect a large number 
		of the crew, soon affect the whole universally. 
		In the above case self-interest acts as a strong motive, for they 
		hope by such means to obtain favors and indulgences; their vanity is 
		also flattered in being allowed to become donors to their commander, and 
		in seeing him the humble recipient of their bounty. 
		The money they do not regard, and the principle they neither 
		understand or [sic] care about. 
		But suppose they are not unanimous—suppose there are one 
		or two recusants among the crew—some Jack Thompson or Bill Smith who is 
		gifted with a little more brain than the others of his shipmates—and 
		does not understand, altogether, the why and the wherefore of bestowing 
		such a present upon a commander who has done nothing but his duty 
		towards the crew—flogging them when they deserved it—and sometimes when, 
		in the said Jack Thompson’s opinion, they did not deserve it. 
		He refuses to subscribe his quota for the plate. 
		What is the consequence? 
		Why the officious coxswain contrives to let the Commodore know of 
		Jack’s recusancy, and from that day he is a marked man. 
		One of the prerogatives of a commander is power over the rank and 
		pay of his sailors.  The rate 
		of every shipped man is at his disposal. 
		He creates or breaks his petty officers—increases or reduces the 
		pay of his sailors, by his power over their rate—at his own will or 
		pleasure.  Suppose Jack 
		Thompson was a petty officer—an opportunity is soon found to disrate 
		him—he is flogged at the gangway—and turned into the afterguard, and 
		ever after damned as being ‘a disgrace to my ship.’ 
		“This is no an 
		exaggerated view of the subject, and it might with perfect justice be 
		more strongly illustrated.  A 
		commander so mean and avaricious as to accept such a present from such a 
		source, and under such degrading circumstances, would not hesitate to 
		persecute a helpless individual, who dared be bold enough to refuse this 
		act of servile homage.  
		Besides, as his own principles could not be of the most elevated order, 
		he could scarcely give a sailor credit for acting from better motives 
		than instigated his own conduct; but would place his refusal to 
		disaffection, surliness or avarice. 
		“W e can 
		conceive of no circumstances under which a commander could accept, with 
		propriety, of a present from his crew—if that crew were still to remain 
		under his command.  And there 
		are but very few cases, and those of a marked description, that would 
		entitle him to accept a present after the discharge of the crew, 
		or the cessation of his command—such, for instance, as having led them 
		to a brilliant victory, and during the action had shown extraordinary 
		personal gallantry.  Or if he 
		had extricated his vessel from a perilous situation by most consummate 
		professional ability.  Or if 
		during the cruise some dreadful epidemic had prevailed on board, and he 
		had resigned his cabin to the sick, that they might be more 
		comfortable—or indeed had done any uncommon action, that had greatly 
		benefited the sailors, and reflected honor upon himself and the 
		service—then upon t heir parting with him they might offer some token of 
		their esteem, which he might with decent propriety accept. 
		But not until he no longer commanded them. 
		“This species 
		of bribery should be equally interdicted with that of receiving presents 
		from foreign Courts—which is prohibited by the constitution. 
		If the custom is suffered to prevail in the navy, there will be 
		an end to all discipline and subordination, and the efficiency of our 
		ships destroyed.  Discipline, 
		to be effective, should be inflexible and even rigorous; requiring 
		absolute control on the part of the commander, and unquestioning 
		submission on that of the men. 
		The reins of government are never relaxed, without some ill 
		consequence to the efficiency of the ship of war. 
		But if commanders as [sic] to receive such bribes from their 
		crews, it is to be feared that instead of sternly adhering to the line 
		of their duties, they will oftener be seeking to propitiate; and instead 
		of enforcing, will descend to persuade. 
		Nay, finally, it will be deemed even disreputable not to 
		have had such a present made them by their crew. 
		The crews will keep it hung in terrorem over their 
		commanders’ heads—and we can only guess at the sacrifices that will be 
		made to secure it. 
		     “Such a 
		delightful state of things would be sufficiently democratic to satisfy 
		even the most rabid loco-foco—and our gallant Navy would become an 
		‘unreal mockery,’—‘a horrible shadow’—a jest and a bye-word.”  
		(Pages 213-4.) 
		     “The 
		frigate Constitution, Com. Elliott, was spoken on the 7th 
		Jan. in lat. 37-8, lon. 4 W. from a cruise, bound to Port Mahon, all 
		well…”   (Page 223.) 
		Number
		16 (April 20, 1837) 
		“Extract from a 
		letter from an officer on board the Mediterranean squadron, to his 
		friend in Washington, dated                              
		Mahon, Feb. 15, 1837. 
		     ‘Com. 
		Elliott has received a pressing invitation from the Sultan, through Com. 
		Porter, to visit Constantinople the ensuing summer. 
		A fine ship of the line, which has so long been promised and 
		expected, would be a noble conveyance for us in an expedition like this. 
		But the fame of old Ironsides, with the General on her bows, will 
		make up for a deficiency in metal or timber. 
		The Sultan, wishing to inspect the whole detail of a first rate 
		man of war, will visit the Constitution on her arrival at 
		Constantinople.  This was 
		done by Ibrahim Pacha, while we were on the coast of Syria last summer. 
		On one occasion, His Highness was dining on board, and being a 
		little in his cups, he made each of us fill, and with bumpers, 
		all standing, he drank to the health of Gen. Jackson , at the same time 
		facing his portrait.  At 
		Alexandria, Mahomet Ali made us a similar visit; and I judge it was from 
		their representations that the Sultan has been induced to invite us to 
		Constantinople, that he may also pay us a visit..’—Globe.” 
		(Page 247.) 
		     “Governor 
		Cass, the American Minister to France, we learn from the New York Times, 
		will make an excursion this summer up the Mediterranean in the 
		Constitution frigate, Com. Elliott. 
		He is to embark at Marseilles, with his family, about March 25th. 
		Constantinople will be visited, and we suppose also Alexandria, 
		Athens, and the Barbary towns, with a view probably to adjust existing 
		treaties, the visit of the Minister not being, we apprehend, one of mere 
		pleasure.”      
		(Page 252.) 
		Number
		18 (May 4, 1837) 
		
		“MARRIAGES
		
		“In Norfolk, on the 20th, ult., Lieut, John M. Berrien, U.S. 
		navy [sic], to Miss Mary A. daughter of the late Capt. George Grice of 
		Philadelphia.”   (Page 
		288.) 
		Number
		22 (June 1, 1837) 
		“MARRIAGE. 
		“In Philadelphia, on the 23d ult. Captain Daniel Turner of the United 
		States Navy, to Catharine M. Bryan, daughter of the late Arthur Bryan, 
		of Charleston, S.C.”   
		(Page 352.) 
		
		Number 23 (June 8, 1837)
		
		“Frigate Constitution was at Marseilles latter part of April, awaiting 
		the arrival of Hon. Lewis Cass from Paris.”    
		(Page 367.) 
		
		Number 24 (June 15, 1837)
		
		“Gov. Cass, the American Minister, embarked at Marseilles for 
		Constantinople, on the 1st May.”      
		(Page 377.) 
		“Constantinople, April 12,-- A 
		few days ago the Ports gave a firman to allow the American 
		frigate United States, Com. Elliott, to come up from the Dardanelles. 
		She brings Com. Porter, the Charge d’Affaires, who has been 
		absent the last twelve months, to recruit his health, and also Gov. 
		Cass, the American minister to Paris, who will first pay a diplomatic 
		visit to Athens.  Whether he 
		will appear in an official character, or not, is more than I have 
		heard.”  (Page 382.) 
		
		Volume V
		
		Number
		1 (July 6, 1837) 
		“The U. S. Mediterranean squadron.—The Frigate Constitution and Schooner 
		Shark sailed from Port Mahon on the 23 of April, 1837, for the coast of 
		France, there to take on board Gov. Cass and family, preparatory to a 
		visit to the coast of Syria and Egypt. 
		Mr. Everett, Chaplain of the Constitution, died at Mahon on the 
		11th of April.”  
		(Page 13.) 
		Number
		10 (September 7, 1837) 
		
		“Copy of a letter from Com. J. D. Elliott to the Secretary of the Navy, 
		dated
		
		
		                                                  
		                           "U. S. Ship Constitution
		
		                                                                                  
		" Malta, June 7, 1837 
		    
		“Sir: I had the honor to state my arrival at Palermo. 
		We sailed thence on the 3d, having no communication with port 
		from quarantine.  While at 
		Leghorn, on the 10th of last month, we took in three 
		distressed American seamen, whom we discovered twenty days out, to be 
		infected with small pock.  
		The cases ere quite mild, and, from the precautions of vaccination of 
		the crew, including the family of Gen. Cass, the disease has not spread. 
		The sick have been removed from the ship to the Hospital of this 
		place. 
		“A quarantine 
		of 25 days was imposed on us here. 
		I declined remaining, and shall proceed immediately on for 
		Athens, the Grecian islands, Egypt, Syria, and, ultimately, to 
		Constantinople, should the plague, now raging there, through information 
		of Sir Charles Vaughan, have abated. 
		On the 12th ult. The Shark sailed from Tunis for 
		Constantinople, with Commodore Porter on board. 
		“Though in 
		quarantine, we have received every possible attention at the hands of 
		Sir. J. Rowley, and other public authorities. 
		I am happy to add, that the utmost harmony continues to prevail 
		in the ship, and that the family of Gen. Cass, through accommodating 
		dispositions, make their situation, in all respects, pleasant and 
		desirable.”  (Page 152.) 
		Number
		12 (September 21, 1837) 
		
		“Constantinople, July 19.--  
		A salute of twenty-one guns, which was answered by as many from the 
		castles, announced the arrival of the magnificent American frigate 
		Constitution in the harbor of this capital on the 15th 
		instant, having on board General Cass, Minister and Envoy of the United 
		States at Paris, who has lately been on a mission to the Court of King 
		Otho.  The real object of the 
		General’s visit to Constantinople is yet unknown; but though by some 
		stated to be merely for pleasure and the recovery of his health, which 
		is rather in an impaired state, it is generally a supposed, by those who 
		are likely to know more about the matter, to be of high political and 
		commercial importance.  His 
		late mission to Greece was for the purpose of negotiating a treaty of 
		commerce with the Greek Government, in which it is stated that he 
		succeeded beyond his most sanguine hopes; and this concluded, it was his 
		intention to have proceeded to Egypt, to have an interview with Mehemet 
		Ali, and thence to have visited the ports and Consular stations of the 
		Levant, for the supposed purpose of carrying into execution such 
		measures and arrangements as would tend to increase and facilitate the 
		commercial relations of the United States with the East; and 
		Constantinople was to have been his last visit. 
		His negotiations in Greece being completed, the General had, with 
		these intentions, sent orders here for the Shark corvette (whose arrival 
		I announced some time since) to join him immediately at Athens, and 
		escort him from thence to Egypt; but hearing, in the meantime, that 
		Mehemet Ali had left for Candia, the General altered his plans, and 
		determined to come here first. 
		From the time the Shark left here she must have passed out of the 
		Dardanelles almost the same day the Constitution passed in. 
		The Americans, have, for the last few years, been using their 
		utmost endeavors to increase their commerce with this country, but 
		hitherto they have been so far unsuccessful that, despite their efforts 
		to support it, instead of increasing it seems yearly to diminish.—Letter 
		in the London Chronicle.”    
		(Page 191.) 
		Number
		17 (October 26, 1837) 
		“COMMODORE ELLIOTT. 
		     “The 
		Editor of the New York Gaz. has read attested copies of all the official 
		proceedings in the case alluded to, and asserts that a case of more 
		flagrant outrage does not stand recorded in our naval annals. 
		     “The case 
		is shortly stated.  The 
		Commodore had bought some Arabian horses, and having sent them all to 
		the United States, except a favorite mare, the officers, on arriving at 
		Port Mahon, proposed a race for the purpose of testing the speed of the 
		animal, the Commodore himself being among the foremost in the 
		proposition.  Two officers of 
		the ship procured horses, and run [sic] against the Commodore’s Arabian, 
		and beat her.  Another race 
		was got up, and then she won. 
		During the excitement consequent upon the race, two of the 
		officers of the navy were talking earnestly in relation to it, and 
		Elliott, riding up, used offensive and very unbecoming language towards 
		one of them, Lieutenant Hunter, brandished his stick over the head of 
		that officer, and ordered him on board the frigate, there to consider 
		himself suspended from duty.  
		The mandate was obeyed.  The 
		unofficer-like scene occurred in the presence of the officers of the 
		British line-of-battle ship Rodney, and immediately afterwards 
		Lieutenant Hunter addressed a letter to the Secretary of the Navy, 
		reporting the outrage on his person and feelings by his commanding 
		officer, and respectfully demanding redress and protection from the 
		Department. 
		“This letter, by the rules of the service, had necessarily to pass 
		through the hands of the Commodore in Chief, and it was accordingly 
		enclosed to Com. Elliott in a respectful letter to that officer; 
		whereupon, the Commander immediately ordered a Court Martial upon Lieut. 
		Hunter, under charge of unbecoming language in his dialogue with his 
		brother officer on the race ground, and of a mis statement [sic] of 
		facts in his letter to the Secretary of the Navy. 
		Capt. Wilkinson, of the frigate United States, was President of 
		the Court; and, after a full examination of witnesses, the Court 
		unanimously and honorably acquitted Lieutenant Hunter of both the 
		charges and their specifications, and Elliott was obliged to approve the 
		proceedings.  Not satisfied, 
		however, he ordered another Court Martial for the trial of the 
		Lieutenant on the treating of the Commodore cavalierly, and, as the 
		specification has it, ‘satirically’ in his defence [sic] before the 
		first Court.  He was 
		unanimously and honorably acquitted again! 
		Now what does the reader suppose was the foundation of this 
		second charge against this persecuted and gallant young officer? 
		     “Why, 
		truly, he had said in his defence [sic], that Commodore Elliott was so 
		bold an fearless an officer, and so celebrated for his high sense of 
		honor, &c., &c., or words to that effect, that no imputation would be 
		made upon his motives.  The 
		language, it must be confessed, was bitterly sarcastic in its 
		application to such a man as Commodore Elliott; but it was perfectly 
		decorous and becoming in phraseology; and, to an officer who deserved 
		it, would of course have been deemed highly complimentary. 
		But Elliott, knowing how little he was entitled to such encomium, 
		very naturally considered it ‘satirical.’ 
		     “Indeed, 
		the whole defence [sic] is a very eloquent paper, drawn up with 
		distinguished ability and perfectly conclusive in its reasoning. 
		The finding of the Court, by the way, is quite as ironical 
		as any portion of the defence [sic]: for, though perfectly decorous, and 
		even respectful in its language, its peculiar application made it 
		quite as open to objection on the Commodore’s part, as the language of 
		Lieutenant Hunter! 
		     “A great 
		number of witnesses were brought forward, and all of them, but two, by 
		Elliott himself.  The 
		officers of the British line-of-battle ship were among the number, and 
		every single witness adduced, swore strongly and most positively in Mr. 
		Hunter’s favor.  The British 
		officers in particular were emphatic in their testimony to the 
		forbearance and propriety with which Mr. Hunter acted throughout the 
		whole transaction. 
		     
		“Lieutenant Hunter is acknowledged on all hands [sic] to be a most 
		excellent and exemplary officer, and is exceedingly beloved throughout 
		the squadron.”  (Page 263.) 
		Number
		26 (December 28, 1837) 
		“Report of the Secretary of the Navy 
		“Navy Department, December 2, 1837 
		“…The squadron in the Mediterranean consists of the frigates 
		Constitution and the United States, and the schooner Shark. 
		This is less than the usual force upon that station, but is 
		deemed adequate to the present exigencies of our commerce in that sea; 
		and as vessels were much wanted for other stations, none have been sent 
		to that since the return of the Potomac and John Adams. 
		The frigate Constitution must be recalled in the early part of 
		the coming year, when an addition can be conveniently made to this 
		squadron, and the ship of the line Pennsylvania sent to that station, 
		should it be deemed expedient…” 
		(Page 1.) 
		
		Volume VI
		
		Number 1 
		(January 4, 1838) 
		“General Cass at Jerusalem.—A letter dated Jerusalem, Aug. 14th, 
		mentions a visit from Gen. Cass, (our Minister to France) family and 
		suite.  They arrived at Jaffa 
		in the frigate Constitution, and were accompanied to Jerusalem by Com. 
		Elliott and several of his officers. 
		Gen. Cass and family staid [sic] with Mr. And Mrs. Whiting, 
		(Missionaries of the American Board, the latter of whom is from this 
		city;) and the remainder of the party, 8 in number, besides servants, 
		with the Rev. Mr. Lanneau.  
		Mrs. Cass and her daughter were in feeble health.—Newark (N. J.) Daily 
		Advertiser.”    
		(Page 13.) 
		“Frigate Constitution, Commodore Elliott, arrived at Port Mahon, Oct. 
		24.” 
		(page 15.) 
		 
		Number 4 
		(January 25, 1838) 
		“From the 
		Globe. 
		“Cruise of the U. S. Frigate Constitution.—By a letter from Marseilles, 
		we learn that the frigate United States, Captain Wilkinson, reached 
		there on the 18th of November, having on board General Cass, 
		Minister to France, his family, and suite. 
		They arrived at Mahon about the 25th of October, in 
		the Constitution, and performed their quarantine at that place. 
		They then embarked on board the United States, and arrived in 
		Marseilles in that vessel. 
		“We understand, from our correspondent, that the cruise of the 
		Constitution has been a most interesting one, and that few vessels have 
		ever passed along a greater line of coast in the same time. 
		She left Marseilles the beginning of May, and sailed from there 
		to Genoa, where she touched; thence to Leghorn, where the party landed, 
		and proceeded through Pisa, Florence, and Siena, to Rome, examining 
		whatever was remarkable in that most interesting region.
		 In the latter city 
		they were presented to the Pope, whose mild and unassuming 
		manners made a very favorable impression upon all the party. 
		From Rome, they travelled through the Campagna, the seat of 
		malaria and death, to Civita Vecchia, and t here re-embarked on board 
		the Constitution.  They then 
		sailed to Palermo, passing in sight of the Lipari Islands, and after 
		remaining three days at the former place, sailed round the western end 
		of Sicily, coasting the island, and having a fine view of the ancient 
		city of Argrigentum, now Girgenti, and of its celebrated ruins, and 
		reached Malta.  From thence 
		they sailed for Greece, and passed for some days along its shores to 
		Athens, where they landed.  
		Here they were gratified with excursions in all directions round the 
		city, particularly to the bay of Salamis, and with a presentation to the 
		young king and queen.  From 
		thence some of the party performed a journey through Eleusis, across the 
		mountains which separated Attica from Boeotia, to the great plain of 
		Thebes, reaching to the foot of the mountains at the city of Platea, 
		memorable for the defeat of the Persians. 
		Extensive remains of this city yet exist, which were explored, as 
		well as the site of this great battle, yet easily identified by the 
		little river Asopus, and by the tumulus in which the dead were buried. 
		From thence they went to Leuctriae, and thence to the ancient 
		city of Thespiae, one of the earliest in Greece, and thence to Thebes. 
		Then through the very heart of the country by the city of 
		Haliartus, the fountain of Lethe, and the field of Cheronaea to Delphi, 
		and thence to the Gulf of Corinth, and down it to the isthmus and the 
		city, and also to the city of Sicyon. 
		On the other side of the isthmus they again found the vessel, and 
		sailed to Cape Colonna and Marathon, where they landed. 
		“From here they proceeded to the island of Tenedos, and landed on the 
		plain of Troy, where  they 
		spent the 4th of July. 
		They then sailed up the Dardanelles into the Sea of Marmora, and 
		to Constantinople, and then up the Bosporus to the Black sea. 
		The plague was so prevalent here that their time and excursions 
		were very much limited.  
		Hence they proceeded to Scio, and then passing the Grecian Archipelago, 
		touching at Delos, they reached Syra [sic], and then went to Candia. 
		Thence to Jaffa, the ancient Joppa, where they landed, and went 
		on to Jerusalem.  From this 
		point they made several excursions to Bethlehem, the Mount of Olives, 
		the tombs of the kings and of the judges, to Jericho, the Jordan, and 
		the Dead Sea, and other places; and after a most interesting residence 
		of several days, they departed, and travelled by Rama, Berri, Nablous, 
		(the ancient Samaria,) the plain of Esdraelon, and Mount Herman, to 
		Nazareth.  Hence by Cana, 
		passing near the foot of Mount Tabor, and near the scene of the miracle 
		of the loaves and fishes, they arrived at the city of Tiberias, on the 
		lake of Galilee.  From here, 
		along the lake shore, by the fountain of Bethsaida, and the site of the 
		ancient Capernaum, and having to their left the old city of Saffad, to 
		the Jordan, which they crossed at Jacob’s bridge. 
		They found this whole region had suffered exceedingly from the 
		earthquake the preceding winter. 
		Tiberias and Saffad having been utterly destroyed. 
		They continued along the highlands, and passed immense numbers of 
		Arabs, encamped in the patriarchal style, with their families and 
		flocks.  They estimated that 
		they saw, almost at one view, 5,000 camels. 
		They arrived at Damascus, and then crossed the ridge of ancient 
		Lebanon to Balbec, and the range of Lebanon to the Cedars, suppose by 
		many to the remains of the forest from which the timber for Solomon’s 
		Temple was taken.  From here 
		they went to Tripoli, in Syria, and re-embarked and sailed for Beirout. 
		Then they passed along the coast in a boat, for the greater 
		convenience of landing, and sailed to Sidon. 
		From there they made an excursion into the ridges of Lebanon, to 
		visit Lady Hester Stanhope and the emir prince of the Druses. 
		They were received with great kindness by Lady Hester, and found 
		that their character as Americans was a passport to her attention. 
		They continued on to the country of the Druses, and were very 
		hospitably entertained, but found that the emir was unfortunately 
		absent.  They then returned, 
		and sailed to the Tyre, and then to St, Jean d’Acre and Caiphas. 
		Here they ascended Mount Carmel, and then, taking horses, they 
		proceeded along the coast, through the magnificent ruins of Caesarea, to 
		Jaffa, where they again found the ship. 
		Then they sailed to Egypt, landed at Alexandria, were presented 
		to Mehemet Ali, passed along the canal, entered the Nile, (then at its 
		height,) and reached Cairo.  
		Here they had an interview with Ibrahim Pacha, examined the city, and 
		visited the site of Heliopolis, or On. 
		They then went up the to the pyramids of Saccara, and then to the 
		great pyramids of Ghizeh [Giza]. 
		After this they returned to Alexandria, and sailed for Cyprus, 
		made an excursion into the interior of the island, and sailed to Malta. 
		“Our correspondent informs us that the whole journey was performed 
		without any unfortunate accident.”  
		(Page 54.) 
		Number
		11 (March 15, 1838) 
		“COMMUNICATIONS
		
		
		“Naval Architecture—No. 5
		
		“…The 
		Constitution, like the United States, has the same curve in her upper 
		works [tumblehome], though not to the same extent. 
		She is certainly a much handsomer ship, and infinitely more 
		comfortable.  Her sailing 
		qualities are satisfactory, though we have seen a number of merchant 
		ships that we think could beat her; and we believe the British frigates 
		Inconstant and Galatea would give her some trouble, particularly going 
		free.  In the French navy, 
		there are frigates that could outsail the Constitution without any 
		difficulty, and thee is no sort of use in qualifying or disguising the 
		fact….   
		M.N.K. » (Page 169.) 
		Number
		20 (May 17, 1838) 
		“Frigate Constitution, Commo. Elliott, sailed from Malta , on the 5th 
		March, for Mahon; and supposed to be bound thence to the United States, 
		to touch at Gibraltar and Madeira.”    
		(Page 320.) 
		Number
		25 (June 21, 1838) 
		“Antiquities from Greece and Asia.—The American Commodore Elliott has on 
		board the Constitution, at Malta, a large collection of very curious 
		antiquities, which he has taken during his cruise in the Levant, from 
		the plains of Marathon and Troy, the neighborhood of Athens, Corinth, 
		and Sunium, different parts of Syria, especially Balbec, the Holy Land, 
		and Egypt.  The most curious 
		articles in this collection are two sarcophagi of marble, found near 
		Beyroot, on the site of the city of Beryta. 
		They were discovered sixteen feet deep in the soil, by a peasant 
		who was digging to set out a Mulberry tree. 
		The Commodore purchased them, and caused them to be transported 
		aboard the frigate from a height 600 feet above the sea. 
		Five hundred men of the crew joined their efforts to carry these 
		masses a distance of a mile and a half. 
		These sarcophagi are of white marble, all in one piece; the 
		smallest has this inscription—Julia Mamaea Augusta. 
		She was the Mother of Alexander Severus, Emperor in the year 222 
		of the Christian era.  The 
		two monuments were empty when taken by the crew of the Constitution.-- 
		
		Paris paper. »     
		(Page 400.) 
		
		Volume VII
		
		 
		Number
		6 (August 9, 1838) 
		“The U. S. frigate Constitution, Commodore Elliott, arrived in Hampton 
		Roads, on Tuesday 31st ult., from the Mediterranean, and 28 
		days from Madeira.   
		“The following is a list of officers: 
		“Commodore J. D. Elliott, Commander in Chief; W. Boerum, Esq., 
		Commander; Oscar Bullus, Chs. H. McBlair, Henry A. Steele, Henry 
		Darcantel, Percival Drayton, Bushrod W. Hunter, Lieutenants; W. 
		J. Muse, Acting Master; Wm. S. Ringgold, 2nd Master; 
		B. Washington, Fleet Surgeon; Samuel Barrington, Surgeon; 
		J. N. Hambleton, Purser; J. L. C. Hardy, Lieut. of Marines; 
		Thomas Wells, Commodore’s Secretary; D. C. McLeod, Assistant 
		Surgeon; E. Middleton, D. F. Dulany, Passed Midshipmen; J. B. 
		Carter, E. C. Anderson, A. H. Jenkins, E. E. Rogers, C. E. Fleming, 
		Chas. Wager, W. C. B. S. Porter, Midshipmen; Robert Whitaker, 
		Boatswain; Thos. Riley, Gunner; Fra’s Sagee, Carpenter; 
		N. C. L’Hommedieu, Sailmaker. 
		“Passengers—P. Mid. Jas. I, Heap, and Mr. H. H. Kuhn, Mahon.”   
		(Pages 93-4.) 
		Number 7 (August 16, 1838)
		
		“An officer on board the U. S. frigate Constitution, in writing to the 
		editor of the Boston Traveller, from Hampton roads, says: ‘I have just 
		time to say that we left Mahon for the United States on the 15th 
		of June.  After a passage of 
		eight days we arrived at Gibraltar; on the 26th we stood out 
		of the bay, an 11 knot breezes taking us in 64 hours over 700 miles to 
		the Island of Madeira, in fair view of its vine-clad hills and vallies 
		[sic] teeming with frits and flowers. 
		Here we passed the 4th of July, and dressed ship in 
		honor of the day; at meridian fired a salute of 26 guns, the band 
		closing with the national air: the occasion was complimented by an 
		elegant dinner given by the American Consul at the island; numerous 
		invited guests were present, consisting of the Commodore and officers of 
		the Constitution, the civil and military authorities, foreign consuls, 
		&c.  The luxuries of the land 
		were furnished forth, and the dessert was crowned with the delicious 
		fruits and wines of the island: old Maderia, Malmsley, Tinta, and other 
		prime brands, passed in bumpers in commemoration of the day, mutual 
		pledges went round, and the feast was enlivened with the music of 
		operas, waltzes, and national airs. 
		“In the evening the Constitution was brilliantly illuminated; lights 
		shone from the mast heads; those planted along the batteries gave her 
		the appearance of a line of battle ship; twenty-six rockets were let off 
		from the quarter-deck, blue lights cast gleams from the yard arms, and 
		illumined, like a thing of enchantment, the image of the ship. 
		So closed the day and its festivities. 
		At midnight we bade adieu to our hospitable host and his guests, 
		who accompanied us to the beach, where we embarked, and soon after got 
		underway for home; and here we are, with bright faces and glad 
		hearts, counting the minutes which separate us from our friends.”   
		(Page 106.) 
		“From the Malta 
		Government Gazette. 
		“Antiquities.— Commodore Elliott has on board the Constitution a number 
		of very curious remains of antiquity, which he collected during his 
		cruise in the Levant, dug  up 
		from the plains of Marathon, and of Troy, from the neighborhood of 
		Athens, Corinth, Sunium, various parts of Syria, and particularly from 
		Balbec, all parts of the Holy Land, and Egypt. 
		But the most remarkable objects with which the new country of the 
		United States will be enriched on his return to his native land, are two 
		marble sarcophagi, found about three quarters of a mile in a direction 
		east north east from Beyrout, in the center of the spot where once stood 
		the ancient city of Berytus.  
		It happened that they were discovered sixteen feet under ground, while 
		his ship was lying off that coast in August last, by a countryman who 
		was planting a mulberry tree; and the Commodore lost no time in 
		purchasing them, and had them immediately conveyed on board his ship, 
		from a height of perhaps six hundred feet above the level of the sea. 
		In their removal across the country, a distance of about a mile 
		and a half to the place of embarkation, on account of the massive 
		weight, obstacles, embarrassing to any but the ingenuity and practical 
		skill of sailors, were to be overcome. 
		By the means of powerful tackles, however, they were slung down 
		precipices, and in many places were passed over yielding soil upon 
		strong spars, and in this task nearly the whole of the ship’s company, 
		consisting of 500 men, were employed. 
		“Each sarcophagus is cut out of a solid piece of white marble, and each 
		has its cover in the form of a sloping roof, also in one piece. 
		With the exception of a fracture in an end of the larger one, 
		which seems to have been broken through in search of the valuable 
		articles which the Romans sometimes buried with their dead, they may be 
		said to be in a perfect state of preservation; for the sculpture on all 
		sides is almost as good as when left by the hand of the artist, 
		consisting of wreaths supported by infantine figures, rosettes, the 
		ram’s head, and the head of the bull. 
		“On the front or principal side of the smaller sarcophagus, we find the 
		following inscription: 
		
		JVLIA.C.FIL
		
		MAMAEA 
		
		VIXIT.ANN.XXX
		
		“Its dimensions are 7 ft. 4 1-2 long, by 2 ft. 7 3-4 wide, within the 
		cornice; and it stands 4 feet 3 inches high to the apex of the cover, 
		which is 19 inches deep. 
		“The larger sarcophagus has no inscription on its tablet, and although 
		not so long as the above by 6 inches, is 3 feet 4 inches wide, and 
		stands 5 feet 2 inches high on the apex of the cover, which is 25 inches 
		deep.  From its capacity and 
		emblems, it appears to have contained the remains of two persons of 
		distinction, the corners being ornamented by figures of victory, instead 
		of the ram’s heads which are seen on the smaller one; and on the cover 
		is cut the apparently unfinished design of two human figures, reclining 
		on a bed or couch.  This 
		cover is quite solid, and of immense weight, and was firmly fixed to the 
		body of the sarcophagus by iron clamps, which may account for its having 
		been broken through in search of plunder. 
		“A brass coin was found in digging these marbles out of the ground, 
		which is now in the possession of Commodore Elliott. 
		On the obverse it has the head of the empress Julia Mamaea, with 
		the inscription ‘Julia Mamaea Augusta’: on the reverse is a figure of 
		Venus seated, holding in  the 
		palm of her right hand an infant erect, and in her left a spear, with 
		the inscription ‘Venus Felix—s. c.’ 
		Now as Julia Mamaea was the mother of Alexander Severus, who 
		became Emperor in the year 222 of the Christian era, there seems to be 
		no difficulty in establishing the third century as the date of the coin, 
		and the general character of the ornaments of both the sarcophagi, as 
		well as the styles of their workmanship, would lead to a belief that 
		they were also of the same epoch. 
		But there is no ground to presume that either of them was the 
		tomb of the mother of the emperor, and as they were found empty, any 
		attempt to determine whose remains they once contained, would be merely 
		hazarding an opinion. 
		“Mr. Giuseppe Hyzler, a well known Maltese artist, has (with the 
		permission of Commodore Elliott) taken correct drawings of these 
		interesting antiquities; the more interesting, because they were brought 
		away by the Commodore as soon as discovered, and no time elapsed for t 
		heir mutilation by the country people, nor have they suffered from the 
		destructive hammers of curious travellers. 
		From these drawings, exact copies or models might be cut., at a 
		trifling expense, in Malta stone, and an idea be thus preserved of the 
		beauty of design of two monuments of Roman grandeur, which are about to 
		leave the old world forever.” 
		(Pages 110-11.) 
		“Frigate Constitution passed up to the navy yard at Norfolk, on 
		Thursday, to be dismasted.”   
		(Page 111.) 
		 
		Number
		13 (September 27, 1838) 
		“Commodore Elliott is distributing the antiquities he collected in 
		Greece, &c., to the different universities and colleges throughout the 
		country.  To the University 
		of Virginia he has presented a Vase, taken from the channel of Corfu, 
		and a piece of a capital of the Temple of Bacchus, at Tyre, with the 
		appropriate devices; also a jug found entombed in the island of Cerigo, 
		two large granite Balls, six feet and a half in diameter, taken from the 
		Dardanelles, and an eagle cut by an American artist from a fragment of 
		the Stadium at Alexandria.” 
		(Page 199.) 
		 
		
		Number 14 (October 4, 1838)
		
		“Pensacola, Sept. 15, --  …It 
		is said that Captain Bolton, late of the navy yard, is appointed to the 
		command of the frigate Constitution, destined for the Mediterranean.”   
		(Page 220.) 
		Number
		20 (November 15, 1838) 
		“Present by Commodore Elliott to Girard College. -- 
		During the proceedings of the city council of Philadelphia, on 
		Thursday, Nov. 1. 
		“The Chair presented the following letters from Isaac Roach, Esq., and 
		Commodore Jesse D. Elliott: 
		“To Wm. Rawle, Esq., President Common Council. 
		Philadelphia, Nov. 1, 1838. 
		“Sir: In conversation with Commodore Elliott, U. S. Navy, at Harrisburgh, 
		in September last, he expressed a desire to present to the city of 
		Philadelphia a Sarcophagus of much value, brought by him to this 
		country.  I suggested the 
		Girard College as a suitable depository for it, and have received the 
		accompanying letter from Capt. Elliott, with drawings of the sculpture, 
		which I request may be laid before councils for their decision. 
		“Very respectfully, sir, your obedient servant, 
		I.   
		Roach. 
		“Carlisle, Sept. 19, 1838. 
		“Dear Sir:  I am pleased to 
		learn, by the conversation I had with you at the unexpected meeting at 
		Harrisburgh, that your connection with the erection of the Girard 
		College, at Philadelphia, might enable you to present a facility, by 
		which the valuable relic of antiquity, obtained at Syria during my visit 
		last summer, and brought home in the Constitution, might have a 
		connection with it. 
		“The Sarcophagus is of Roman origin, and is believed to exist with the 
		second century; was obtained about three quarters of a mile north east 
		of the present city of Beyroot, where once stood the ancient city of 
		Beiritus.  It is of pure 
		white marble, ornamented with sacrificial and other devices, as 
		represented in the accompanying drawing, and appears to me might 
		appropriately be connected with the Institution, which, when completed, 
		will be both ornamental and useful to the city of Philadelphia. 
		“Should this tender be accepted, it will afford me much satisfaction to 
		forward the authority, by which it may be removed from the Navy Yard at 
		Norfolk, its present temporary depository, to that of Girard College, 
		Philadelphia, its permanent abode. 
		“I am, very truly yours, 
		J. Duncan Elliott.” 
		“P. S.  On referring to one 
		of the journals of the city of Philadelphia, a more detailed description 
		may be had. 
		“Major Isaac Roach, 
		Late of the U. 
		S. Army, Philadelphia.”    
		(Pages 318-9.) 
		 
		Number
		23 (December 6, 1838) 
		
		                 
		                     “OFFICIAL—NAVAL GENERAL ORDER
		
		                                                          
		”Navy Department, 
		                                                                      
		"November 28, 1838. 
		“The practice 
		of bringing home, in the public vessels of the United States, various 
		animals, such as horses, asses, mules, and other quadrupeds, formerly 
		authorized by this Department, having been found by recent experience 
		productive of great inconvenience, is hereby strictly prohibited in 
		future. 
		J. K. Paulding.”    
		(Page 368.)  |